From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4D18E5D for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 04:09:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mhall-osx-home.local (99-34-229-174.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.34.229.174]) by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1CFBF for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:09:04 -0500 (EST) To: dev@dpdk.org From: Matthew Hall Message-ID: <56A04BCF.100@mhcomputing.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:09:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] Status of Linux Foundation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 03:09:05 -0000 Hello, I was just reading the following blog post about downscaling community involvement at the Linux Foundation. http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/39546.html I wondered if any of issues discussed there this might be relevant for the governance efforts moving forward on DPDK? Sincerely, Matthew.