From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE34C2B95
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:17:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Mar 2016 02:17:05 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,354,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="940039191"
Received: from shwdeisgchi083.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.67.193])
 ([10.239.67.193])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Mar 2016 02:17:04 -0700
To: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <56E6F176.80304@intel.com>
 <1457988650-52797-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Cc: helin.zhang@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
 adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
From: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Message-ID: <56EBC790.4010009@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:17:04 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1457988650-52797-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 01/11] ethdev: add API to query supported
	packet types
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:17:07 -0000

Hi Thomas,

On 3/15/2016 4:50 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> Add a new API rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes to query what packet types
> can be filled by given already started device (or its pmd rx burst function
> has already been decided).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> ---
> v9:
>   - Fix rte_ether_version.map as Ferruh Yigit sugguests.
>   lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map |  7 +++++++
>   3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
...
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> index d8db24d..c242e71 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ether_version.map
> @@ -117,3 +117,10 @@ DPDK_2.2 {
>   
>   	local: *;
>   };
> +
> +DPDK_16.04 {
> +	global:
> +
> +	rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes;
> +
> +} DPDK_2.2;

Although this series is rebased on dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04, but applying 
this into v16.04-rc1 only needs to remove change in 
rte_ether_version.map. Shall I send a new version? Or this series will 
simply be deferred?

Thanks,
Jianfeng