Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] lpm allocation fixes - v3

[Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>]

On 03/16/2016 03:16 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Poking a bit on autotest revealed a few shortcomings in the lpm allocation path.
> Thanks to the feedback to the first revision of the patches here v2.
> Also Oliver Matz spotted similar issues and made me aware - thanks!
> Integrating them revealed even more use after free / leak issues.
> 
> *updates in v3*
> - lpm create/free path for v20 and v1604 got the same fixes that were
>   already identified for lpm6 before
> 
> *updates in v2*
> - lpm/lpm6 patches split
> - following dpdk coding guidelines regarding single line if's
> - adding singed-off and acked-bys gathered so far
> - combine all three related patches in one series
> 
> [PATCH 1/5] lpm6: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm6_create
> [PATCH 2/5] lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm
> [PATCH 3/5] lpm: fix missing free of lpm
> [PATCH 4/5] lpm: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm_create*
> [PATCH 5/5] lpm: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm in
> 
> diffstat:
>  rte_lpm.c  |   23 ++++++++++-------------
>  rte_lpm6.c |   12 ++++++------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 

Series
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>

Just one small comment: there are additional { } in patches
2/5 and 3/5.

Thomas, do you think you can remove it while pushing?