From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626A5584
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:19:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 20so89552028wmh.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=P22iWgvlvRUogLDzuaE3M+vGICg72O/h3YJS+e8c4/k=;
 b=k8ldg8cPyaTfYP+FyWP/m5sNMY90XQQp3MPrINhy1iTPKugqhyl2ktvCx0OcqbVDEk
 Z13AGFSPpDkewONtHMQZzIahM/WFSzrl41SlQKmq6WLkyhBCUx0sOmqiuiRQE6VFhVvY
 BBYAJu4u/rYms+Wm6eCHlBv54JOZ/mryEkscRn9X+mMQToKIWecx1XbQxQWJ87iUxG7h
 EsNl1X8YEs5wdJ475xG+AnE2/pABetlLZ3LyD3/pbJdegzokrO65357YwcxFvSbFV3c0
 lLWNccKDKRt5oufoZ8Sx+dvqSQikoLTz+75OOH6nn7j2oNSIMY7vp7iTjlkMMBEmdwCv
 jUnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization
 :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=P22iWgvlvRUogLDzuaE3M+vGICg72O/h3YJS+e8c4/k=;
 b=I19jygNjUdS+D5A25f/hXRJxahyqJAdej/X4tceFw8+fU3YLgHPJdK0qOR+Ozqg5tF
 3a+/BGdSzGL/gYN1c9owKvwdK2FfkWAD9zLtrNiNPMHwt4JUg98rejcRNJ5K9zXjE8g/
 xU4AIgEgUK1so/ztAwh0mGt9Rv7L29khFpniBipzNjaAgo65JqIq43URNaBnA/SCrDtO
 l/mO6Iz5wP8bXCpF8EVmWQLrUP76ALT7Z3Bdh3KjjF78toIq6YQ2ajgdcm/1CzzVDpuJ
 tPHsxyz7SKHora0RWIzD0ZYln6fvn996r5RpMCE63D7VSzr08EUm4BaEGUwfvaeA8ryJ
 1qJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKqmrn2r447NWY99NYznla7fsPKFIHBmXG+JT8r/aQ0DTZojI0KXGNR77kcLh+UdQDI
X-Received: by 10.194.89.70 with SMTP id bm6mr13404785wjb.0.1459376362963;
 Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:203b:41f5:e6b5:f8cd?
 ([2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:203b:41f5:e6b5:f8cd])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gk4sm5952464wjd.7.2016.03.30.15.19.21
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Lee Roberts <lee.roberts@hpe.com>
References: <1459361615-6021-1-git-send-email-lee.roberts@hpe.com>
 <20160330145042.1708ecee@xeon-e3>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, dev@dpdk.org
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Organization: www.6wind.com
Message-ID: <56FC5095.9040000@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:17:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160330145042.1708ecee@xeon-e3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix KNI compilation under Wind River Linux
 6.0 recent RCPLs.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:19:23 -0000

Le 30/03/2016 23:50, Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> Do we want to require DPDK to work in the face of every weird vendor
> kernel backport. This is a road to nowhere...
+1 with Steve. No way! There is no rational.