From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6756A00C2; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:25:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67F242DF1; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:25:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582D2410F2 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104CC5C0184; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 05:25:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 05:25:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1665653116; x= 1665739516; bh=tbh7lQLZ1UMglTrcUZqET3oKoX8ECAeBXpSBbTz+prQ=; b=U fyxcy7sOQ6saBwS0iDvp+IJ0bGF5YRGwKIi1PcZ3jqXx5aP7Qm/n0M53LlDnzrzg rCY8ipJ5/fCGbcbwTy0xSW8e9gyOT6Ws/3DN/czcsM1XFgmExijuyRos1nGE5kl8 yPZ5qR0d3EfR3bDkiK5FyCA6Yty/RJcm7AbIJM9zWPljINHjHasO/N0O5jPenrCt r52Gs3NlbRY/7fIoyX5FwvLVml8CobviKxCA9/AdaXgm9ZG6Zq0+GmVH6CIiC4o5 dGx5aeYfjMC+uOfhquhJcBTcF9rpnF9//ScI0YgNpeAKfFVRVGAnUDX8Ojv0df6O 3+AQg3PEn4FpQCzkCnykw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1665653116; x= 1665739516; bh=tbh7lQLZ1UMglTrcUZqET3oKoX8ECAeBXpSBbTz+prQ=; b=g GuoIgPRw+b/2Jt88tQAN+0E7bSUnkpMWVWQ97K5xAmeVjiuYkVJg/Pp7R8GZa7n6 6k7u9KWFt0AZp5bxB9cfbNaZZeXk6e7ZjCLLW0NfVPEMwp1K7NpcZJ4jQozksL6C E/Im4KwJprogT2X1Hs89aHvDpBgWpLt2lQ1X1A/L3SLNBdbhAZJ340quhfLtsSLi 3o3kcqhQO1529/3EW+aDGRYkRc9mGszQ9e2Zg3aJG16mmwYnkB4kRty3t18oPGD2 BghG2fXrRnzPMUGLl92e0VzVwCJbl8Wrk5TtSdZ2M1CJpfHXekJX1ixvimN623pq 3INrcYPRtUsAxsW/L6vOA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeektddgudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtjeeiieefhedtfffgvdelteeufeefheeujefgueetfedttdei kefgkeduhedtgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 05:25:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Nicolas Chautru , Gagandeep Singh , Hemant Agrawal Cc: Akhil Goyal , david.marchand@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, Tom Rix , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: baseband PMD APIs Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:25:13 +0200 Message-ID: <5703375.X9hSmTKtgW@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org To bbdev maintainers, Do you think we can avoid having some PMD-specific configuration? It looks blocking migration from a driver to another. How do we manage that? 13/10/2022 11:07, Akhil Goyal: > There are 6 bbdev PMDs, out of which 3 have pmd APIs - all from Intel > These are the PMD APIs for baseband drivers. > rte_acc_configure -> this is being used by 2 drivers(acc100 and acc200) merged in a single folder. > rte_fpga_5gnr_fec_configure > rte_fpga_lte_fec_configure > > The fpga ones have almost same syntax.