From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098102C08 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:14:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from was59-1-82-226-113-214.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.113.214] helo=[192.168.0.10]) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anlRq-0007vE-BE; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:16:34 +0200 To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <1459841759-23296-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1459857229-9814-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" From: Olivier Matz Message-ID: <5704EFA2.8080901@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:14:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:14:51 -0000 On 04/06/2016 12:32 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > > I wonder if you should include something in release notes. > We are fixing the API, so I guess we don't need to follow the deprecation process, but at least a note in the documentation? Good idea, I'll send a v4 with the deprecation notice. > Apart from that, > > Series-acked-by: Pablo de Lara Thank you for the review. Olivier