From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D512A2C06
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:09:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2016 00:09:52 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,508,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="689155429"
Received: from shwdeisgchi083.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.67.193])
 ([10.239.67.193])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2016 00:09:43 -0700
To: Nissim Nisimov <NissimN@Radware.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
References: <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD906D2592102@ILMB1.corp.radware.com>
From: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Message-ID: <57172B36.4020701@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:09:42 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD906D2592102@ILMB1.corp.radware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TSO support for Virtio_pmd
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:09:54 -0000

Hi Nissim,

On 4/20/2016 2:10 PM, Nissim Nisimov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I see some additions in dpdk 16.04 to support TSO for vhost-user dpdk driver with vanilla linux virtio VM.
>
> Does dpdk Virtio driver support TSO with the current code?

Virtio pmd driver does not support TSO for now.

> if not, is there any plan to support it in the future?

Previously, it's implemented in the v3 of the patchset, which you are 
referring to, but abandoned in the v4.
v3: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/27512
v8: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/32743

It may be because that there's no consumers (L4 stack) for this feature. 
And if you want that, you could make that as a reference.

Thanks,
Jianfeng

>
> Thanks,
> Nissim