From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094D95A6D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:43:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so53330513wic.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=X3ZXXF+juIGy/Zkh2D80EUHmBVa1IaGPIwzxzZYi9l8=;
 b=QlOxzl6bE87OgtBmFuJtayfNCuY9EX3mYt087vyY9L1XyB8/ZT59MoCPuQLMyvIhWa
 uPdK5Gos4oXQpvISFwqUP5tMkEvX6uW9DcXqkzfzDBvlCXndjskeyKNZb2V6W02t/6rG
 STloGjVec0yglu6y8HFDQfKZRaYDBECKchJv6QHcM7Nk8KSicKDQdBWgByp50fcbeHeo
 QZ8Ou6Oq+pVzuobC9w9+U8KpWjTD8qpjTobxaCzYI6KrP8fhlIq5DhR5IB3YOZks7lCl
 SYiQDEsc8Ij9S7ZvisVjEI+A9H2CSAp6u/96G/v5weYoljU/l87+iFn2UwJKVlDGOMMZ
 6fxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQled4olgP207ijdf64Y01BM8eUYnOPJ1iLjnRqu44hB2p5DoqSLv6utXfGBostzaL2Z9ZKn
X-Received: by 10.194.2.51 with SMTP id 19mr57990007wjr.40.1439286181790;
 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fa8sm2532777wib.14.2015.08.11.02.43.00
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:41:48 +0200
Message-ID: <5718603.p4NHCSAFxq@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1439275763-12481-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
References: <1439275763-12481-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vm_power: fix improper physical
	core mask
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:43:02 -0000

2015-08-11 14:49, Yong Liu:
> Host cpu mapping structure can only support 64 cpus. When run vm_power sample
> on platform with more than 64 cpus, will generate improper physical core mask.
> After limited supported host cpus to 64 will fix this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>

Fixes: e9f64db94637 ("examples/vm_power: show warning when more than 64 cores")

Applied, thanks