DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aurojit Panda <apanda@cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] DPDK 16.04 link changes cause PMD drivers to not be loaded
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:29:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718F1ED.6000706@cs.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2358356.HZLcvC2y3R@xps13>

[The original report is included below for your convenience]

Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-04-21 08:01, Aurojit Panda:
>> Panu Matilainen wrote:
> [...]
>>> Again, PMDs are *plugins* that are *meant* to be loaded at runtime.
>>> That allows for all sorts of flexibility especially
>>> for packaging and shipping, at some extra cost in setup complexity.
>> I am all for a plugin architecture, I was merely suggesting that you
>> embed some path infromation at the beginning. Also please note:
>> (a) This behavior changed recently.
>
> What changed recently?
>
>> (b) This change is entirely undocumented, which is why I was reporting
>> it in the first place.
>> (c) It is actually quite unintutive, because previously ensuring
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH was correct was all that was required
>> to get any DPDK application to interact with ports.
>
> ?
> Are you talking about combined library?
>
>>> For your own purposes, you can of course tweak the linking settings
>>> as much as you like. Look for "plugins" in mk/rte.app.mk and change
>>> the shared lib condition on the line above to "y" and there you have it.
>>> But that's not the way plugins are meant to be used.
>> That is not a reasonable solution given that it makes it very hard to
>> track future changes to DPDK without merges.
>> My alternatives neither break people's abilities to use plugins,
>> nor do they impact behavior.
>
> Please do not hesitate to send some patch to show your solution.
> Thanks

I was trying to run testpmd from DPDK 16.04 on Linux with kernel version 4.4.0-1 (ld version 2.26). My machine has two
XL710QDA2 NICs, and I built DPDK as a shared, combined library (i.e., CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y and
CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS=y in config/common_linuxapp). I found that the issue is due to ld not linking against all
libraries with the new linker script (introduced in 948fd64befc3726) but am not sure how to fix this. As evidence for
this being caused by this change:

$ LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=y ./testpmd -c 0x1c00 -n 4 -w 82:00.0 -w 82:00.1 --file-prefix "send" -- -i
           linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe11b3e000)
           librte_distributor.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_distributor.so.1.1
(0x00007fa55eb85000)
           librte_reorder.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_reorder.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55e982000)
           librte_pipeline.so.3.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_pipeline.so.3.1 (0x00007fa55e77d000)
           librte_table.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_table.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55e55e000)
           librte_port.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_port.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55e34e000)
           librte_timer.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_timer.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55e145000)
           librte_hash.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_hash.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55df37000)
           librte_jobstats.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_jobstats.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55dd35000)
           librte_lpm.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_lpm.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55db2e000)
           librte_power.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_power.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55d91f000)
           librte_acl.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_acl.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55d705000)
           librte_meter.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_meter.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55d504000)
           librte_sched.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_sched.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55d2fd000)
           librte_vhost.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_vhost.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55d0e6000)
           librte_kvargs.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_kvargs.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55cee4000)
           librte_mbuf.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_mbuf.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55cce2000)
           librte_ip_frag.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_ip_frag.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55cada000)
           libethdev.so.3.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/libethdev.so.3.1 (0x00007fa55c84f000)
           librte_cryptodev.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_cryptodev.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55c647000)
           librte_mempool.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_mempool.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55c444000)
           librte_ring.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_ring.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55c242000)
           librte_eal.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_eal.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55bfe1000)
           librte_cmdline.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_cmdline.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55bdd8000)
           librte_cfgfile.so.2.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_cfgfile.so.2.1 (0x00007fa55bbd6000)
           librte_pmd_bond.so.1.1 => /home/apanda/e2d2/3rdparty/dpdk/build/lib/librte_pmd_bond.so.1.1 (0x00007fa55b9c4000)
           libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fa55b7ae000)
           libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fa55b5aa000)
           libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fa55b38d000)
           libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fa55afe9000)
           /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fa55ed87000)
           libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fa55aceb000)
           librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007fa55aae3000)


As you can see librte_pmd_i40e.so is missing from the list of files. Furthermore, using

$ LD_PRELOAD="../lib/librte_pmd_i40e.so" ./testpmd -c 0x1c00 -n 4 -w 82:00.0 -w 82:00.1 --file-prefix "send" -- -i
correctly enumerates the NICs.

I unfortunately do not how to fix the linker script as checked in, but wanted to report this bug in case someone has a fix.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <57158D01.5020407@cs.berkeley.edu>
     [not found] ` <57173EA4.9000208@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <5717917D.9030504@cs.berkeley.edu>
     [not found]     ` <571895D9.3090700@redhat.com>
2016-04-21 15:01       ` Aurojit Panda
2016-04-21 15:18         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-21 15:24           ` Aurojit Panda
2016-04-22 10:08             ` Panu Matilainen
2016-04-21 15:29           ` Aurojit Panda [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5718F1ED.6000706@cs.berkeley.edu \
    --to=apanda@cs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).