From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35DC37A8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 22:40:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n184so864727wmn.1 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3blqyoOp77Xmj6t9ccJmjxa891sxoTEYo5MhXWBc3E=; b=1aEDvrg7nPw284Cu4xHUT3uN/BwKg8F53K5y9eK88/g8QyPyD065YGfsgMwK6vpW5O dFWPe+ujxHtVhIL4JcWsLiwrgIJw+A2MhzHp/4xb1ULtv6pNENFjZIdh5JCsJo4x6HoD 7Oy2OdX0qI5n3w+dy7xUSdLXSvrKBo8QhzhpiEnEyCmioo82yDErJ3IHw3qzpQbfnZpE yZGQ09Z5fyT/mHRTHxPcAWOOkesTch/Vo6xSK2vJCMRSBafyf0nqbtRHJo0chduLa1Ov pmpC3dmvIiXl3MVEPslvKa71JVZXW6eh76EysKvGHg4sAGtvKCBQJbRk3qhI2Nb/fHBW TxQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3blqyoOp77Xmj6t9ccJmjxa891sxoTEYo5MhXWBc3E=; b=MwFJAVI+3qdfcGtosgvXe7oBlc2nsAoRrM43oy7BsyDLJCci4YpcLykNZDeVqYqelV H0CdoSeJTO9RGJyEnlmYcXP2ybGfzYw2p4wUzUD5VqhAb4goO4vxPzhodCBtJEGZfItC VAib1fW8E7bSrFCpAD4k1I1wGdVwwv2KJc/tnOusyS95OjzyAicwEC8ce2kfzZwackAc NqW446hSa3RzDcEf1+mOAVupMO5LJ7LyCzNgi//vQbSYZ64pEcjg8vSgUS2PxgSSinN4 b+8OQzizLpQWhlB/Sp7IheHCwf+5l/kxWWXGh7CYrjdaieWd153AuKKYV336otd3D2eP FMPA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKrn9LKbbRzX4LlMJtzraFh9OkE7lVe3BMJqxN4F2AKpygh1qEtYjeGU8YgGL5zOQPp X-Received: by 10.194.176.167 with SMTP id cj7mr25959wjc.36.1464727253595; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.16] (85-171-34-230.rev.numericable.fr. [85.171.34.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm41768974wji.40.2016.05.31.13.40.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 May 2016 13:40:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Jan Viktorin , "Hunt, David" References: <1463665501-18325-3-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com> <20160523144530.290b8e97@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> <574D56B5.8040009@intel.com> <20160531141419.12b293f6@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, pmatilai@redhat.com From: Olivier MATZ Message-ID: <574DF6D3.6050006@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 22:40:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160531141419.12b293f6@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev, v5, 2/3] app/test: test external mempool handler X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 20:40:53 -0000 Hi, On 05/31/2016 02:14 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2016 10:17:41 +0100 > "Hunt, David" wrote: >> On 5/23/2016 1:45 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: >>> The test becomes quite complex. What about having several smaller >>> tests with a clear setup and cleanup steps? >> >> I guess that's something we can look at in the future. For the moment >> can we leave it? > > Yes, just a suggestion. I think, Olivier (maintainer) should request this if needed. Yes, I think we can let it as is for now. But I agree this is something we could enhance. Thanks Olivier