From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57AB5681
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:19:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF172202E;
 Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:19:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:19:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=KXrGhmP834tz7R+/ZQQD586XiFjwjN2lYpq0wzHW3Is=; b=ReEHq4ZHE3C6
 x12SS2v8mR/FIwbf6kjoFYmdeOXR0VVryfVrlWQBaH0jDoU1qzodZuH/1255S1Pr
 aoxTv7/GORNWUSXT4S749QEP72S1NIYlT/8rzIFM9thHOix7APp5MBRC3cPwrrr/
 CBLBuz71YPHhxRcwX5ePCP/bokOXjmo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KXrGhmP834tz7R+/ZQQD586XiFjwjN2lYpq0wzHW3
 Is=; b=zYkq9BE2K6++5uAZxEue8AFZH+PzZ2fVdlAJ9Al2PNSddLuAHUj7/BnGO
 rQWYpN2Nftl78cDj0OCPNqCXHQ0/vzCpnG7FC8OcFXbDpWdFvfpvJ4T/+rfm9OMR
 UpKRVpXuwO/hfMJiSTxuss/a6N426q6d1BHSHgbHi3BocTbc1M7fcyrFXBS/9b9G
 fY0O36S846GEy8Ky8OND+yyHSUf8AMeO3HPOUTqZ8hO7KP0AxAXBld5NPdVYZy4O
 4bA8ZNcY9Yb1yeYm2ORFw6gSI5+N2+BtI4qCM6CKAaCzdW6eKHCWJYnFhSbYrlTU
 lcwbdh5tbmSwCjU/n+DXw4xylYm4w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:bXHQW0INItsWr27clA_dqnEPiglLnExnfA9PwiwjQVBUrAwDOnpoXg>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:bXHQW1mTmqNj8vX_EKUCQDh9kbisRr0FYkVOS6XUHibMgygfDG1Bcg>
 <xmx:bXHQW7CxJH0iM12pi3S8JRquQLiaLProx4IQuwlBta_1YGWyZ4ZLYg>
 <xmx:bXHQWwTmZTcfgLdg-5-yN0h07BmPgBEk6T98tY-M0RT04q9D232b9g>
 <xmx:bXHQW2IQGKyPog0BNpOeK96POCrazVdg0E8nk9jL5ky4bW7jgtpqlg>
 <xmx:bXHQW4FLhpwQjIAAhBzLdQcPhJNGIj-YWwGWoUEC6JsKudzUntjAHw>
 <xmx:bnHQW2Dt1P1O5hTPVoVJSTYa11OZCdhxhvxma1pDtL7PyNYbZpc8bw>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 16AA9102EA;
 Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:19:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
 ophirmu@mellanox.com
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:19:45 +0200
Message-ID: <5755587.GAzGENloro@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20181024131321.8409-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
References: <20181024131321.8409-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix iterator default behaviour for
	representors
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:19:43 -0000

24/10/2018 15:13, Thomas Monjalon:
> The iterator was matching all representors if it was not specified
> in the devargs string. It was a wrong default behaviour.
> 
> If there is no representor parameter in the devargs, the iterator
> should not match any representor port.
> 
> The implementation of the default behaviour would be simpler
> if a "no match" handler is added to rte_kvargs_process().
> As it requires an API breakage, it will be reworked later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

It is fixing the commit "support representor id as iterator filter"
which is in dpdk-next-net tree.
I think we should not squash them. It is fine to have both patches
separated with a clear explanation.
When the first commit will be in mainline, we could add a Fixes: tag
to this patch.