From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgw.gov.kz (mgw.gov.kz [195.12.113.254]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039ABC47A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:11:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sts.kz (mail.sts.kz [178.89.4.9]) by mgw.gov.kz with ESMTP id u5FCBelq006386-u5FCBels006386 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:11:40 +0600 Received: from [172.20.19.232] (unknown [178.89.4.11]) by sts.kz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E2628652A; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:11:39 +0600 (ALMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 sts.kz E2628652A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sts.kz; s=mail; t=1465992699; bh=4WVh+ixWA5akn5+KRpMD74JoCefAssxZld5dHy7zvS4=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=cX2oeebAS5QkkDAru5MQUiV2SCQsQsDCWII3PnowbDX5p6vZqdYOU7lT63grV/MBl F4WJ0FjE60oPncRZlMR2mxpZ79piYXgzfQGifvlkBpwXMtiKDUs1xZiTxzUz0GFxrY iux1pENWxh3S53KfWEQJihvT5TogWfKsXz2Wv0U4= To: Jay Rolette References: <5761235C.2090906@sts.kz> Cc: DPDK From: Yerden Zhumabekov Message-ID: <576145FB.2000902@sts.kz> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:11:39 +0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] random pkt generator PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:11:41 -0000 On 15.06.2016 17:50, Jay Rolette wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Yerden Zhumabekov > wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> DPDK already got a number of PMDs for various eth devices, it even has PMD >> emulations for backends such as pcap, sw rings etc. >> >> I've been thinking about the idea of having PMD which would generate mbufs >> on the fly in some randomized fashion. This would serve goals like, for >> example: >> >> 1) running tests for applications with network processing capabilities >> without additional software packet generators; >> 2) making performance measurements with no hw inteference; >> 3) ability to run without root privileges, --no-pci, --no-huge, for CI >> build, so on. >> >> Maybe there's no such need, and these goals may be achieved by other means >> and this idea is flawed? Any thoughts? >> > Are you thinking of something along the lines of what BreakingPoint (now > part of Ixia) does, but as an open source software tool? > More dreaming than thinking though :) Live flows generation, malware, attacks simulation etc is way out of scope of PMD dev, I guess.