From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.hunt@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3E2C792
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:42:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2016 01:42:38 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,482,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="977714315"
Received: from dhunt5-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.29])
 ([10.237.220.29])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2016 01:42:37 -0700
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
References: <1465976824-83823-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <1466080236-112618-1-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <1466080236-112618-2-git-send-email-david.hunt@intel.com>
 <57639F86.9050503@intel.com> <5763B018.5090602@6wind.com>
Cc: viktorin@rehivetech.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
 shreyansh.jain@nxp.com
From: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Message-ID: <5763B7FC.80608@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:42:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5763B018.5090602@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13 1/3] mempool: support external mempool
	operations
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:42:39 -0000



On 17/6/2016 9:08 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 06/17/2016 08:58 AM, Hunt, David wrote:
>> A comment below:
>>
>> On 16/6/2016 1:30 PM, David Hunt wrote:
>>> +/**
>>> + * Set the ops of a mempool.
>>> + *
>>> + * This can only be done on a mempool that is not populated, i.e.
>>> just after
>>> + * a call to rte_mempool_create_empty().
>>> + *
>>> + * @param mp
>>> + *   Pointer to the memory pool.
>>> + * @param name
>>> + *   Name of the ops structure to use for this mempool.
>> + * @param pool_config
>> + *   Opaque data that can be used by the ops functions.
>>> + * @return
>>> + *   - 0: Success; the mempool is now using the requested ops functions.
>>> + *   - -EINVAL - Invalid ops struct name provided.
>>> + *   - -EEXIST - mempool already has an ops struct assigned.
>>> + */
>>> +int
>>> +rte_mempool_set_ops_byname(struct rte_mempool *mp, const char *name,
>>> +        void *pool_config);
>>> +
>>
> The changes related to the pool_config look good to me.
>
> If you plan to do a v14 for this API comment, I'm wondering if the
> documentation could be slightly modified too. I think "external mempool
> manager" was the legacy name for the feature, but maybe it could be
> changed in "alternative mempool handlers" or "changing the mempool
> handler". I mean the word "external" is probably not appropriate now,
> especially if we add other handlers in the mempool lib.
>
> My 2 cents,
> Olivier

I had not planned on doing another revision. And I think the term "External
Mempool Manager" accurately describes the functionality, so I'd really
prefer to leave it as it is.

Regards,
David.