From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F48F5A56 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:44:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2016 03:44:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,503,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="1006574416" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.90]) ([10.237.220.90]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2016 03:44:24 -0700 To: Yuanhan Liu , Nelio Laranjeiro References: <1465379291-25310-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> <1466493818-1877-1-git-send-email-nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> <20160621074308.GL23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tetsuya Mukawa From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <57691A87.4000200@intel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:44:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160621074308.GL23111@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/25] Refactor mlx5 to improve performance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:44:26 -0000 On 6/21/2016 8:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > Hi, > > Here is an off-topic comment: would you please add following line to > the sendemail section of your git config file? > > chainreplyto = false > > That would let me to break the long threads in my client much easier. > Otherwise, it's hard for me to do it, leading that your thread occupies > several screens on my side. > > It seems that Tetsuya also has the issue, thus CC'ed. > As far as I can see this is not related to the chainreplyto option, but "--no-thread" seems set, because all patchsets sent as reply to first mail of first patchset [C]. Correct setting should be "--thread and --no-chain-reply-to" Although this is really detail, for multi version patchsets, if there is a preferred way between (A) or (B) I would like to learn too? A) - [0/N] - - [1/N] - - [2/N] - - [v2 0/N] - - - [v2 1/N] - - - [v2 N/N] - - - [v3 0/N] - - - - [v3 1/N] - - - - [v3 N/N] - - - - [v4 0/N] - - - - - [v4 1/N] - - - - - [v4 N/N] B) - [0/N] - - [1/N] - - [2/N] - - [v2 0/N] - - - [v2 1/N] - - - [v2 N/N] - - [v3 0/N] - - - [v3 1/N] - - - [v3 N/N] - - [v4 0/N] - - - [v4 1/N] - - - [v4 N/N] C) - [0/N] - - [1/N] - - [2/N] - - [v2 0/N] - - [v2 1/N] - - [v2 N/N] - - [v3 0/N] - - [v3 1/N] - - [v3 N/N]