From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Received: from proxy.6wind.com (host.76.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com
 [62.23.145.76]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0392B1396
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:38:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.16.0.195] (unknown [10.16.0.195])
 by proxy.6wind.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA55E25152;
 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:38:32 +0200 (CEST)
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <5773EB79.1090509@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:38:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dpdk-dev] xstats performance
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:38:33 -0000

Hi Remy,

While adapting an application to the new xstats API, I discovered
that it may not be so efficient to display the statistics and their
names.

I think the test-pmd code illustrates the issue pretty well:

/* Display xstats */
for (idx_xstat = 0; idx_xstat < cnt_xstats; idx_xstat++)
	for (idx_name = 0; idx_name < cnt_xstats; idx_name++)
		if (xstats_names[idx_name].id == xstats[idx_xstat].id) {
			printf("%s: %"PRIu64"\n",
				xstats_names[idx_name].name,
				xstats[idx_xstat].value);
			break;
		}

The displaying is in O(n^2).

It's possible to enhance the code to have it in O(n), but it
requires an intermediate table.

Why not changing this:

   struct rte_eth_xstat {
   	uint64_t id;
   	uint64_t value;
   };
   struct rte_eth_xstat_name {
   	char name[RTE_ETH_XSTATS_NAME_SIZE];
   	uint64_t id;
   };

Into this:

   struct rte_eth_xstat {
   	uint64_t id;
   	uint64_t value;
   };
   struct rte_eth_xstat_name {
   	char name[RTE_ETH_XSTATS_NAME_SIZE];
   	/* No identifier */
   };

And assume that the id field in rte_eth_xstat corresponds to
the index in the rte_eth_xstat_name table?


The test-pmd code would be something like this:

/* Display xstats */
for (idx_xstat = 0; idx_xstat < cnt_xstats; idx_xstat++) {
	printf("%s: %"PRIu64"\n",
		xstats_names[xstats[idx_xstats].id].name,
		xstats[idx_xstat].value);
}


What do you think?

Regards
Olivier