From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47FC2B83 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:58:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2017 15:58:31 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,247,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="54202156" Received: from ecollett-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.1.116]) ([10.252.1.116]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2017 15:58:30 -0800 To: Alejandro Lucero , dev@dpdk.org References: <1484308202-5198-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <577f6eb1-dc21-ff1f-0a91-eb91a6718377@intel.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:58:30 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: build nfp pmd support by default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:58:33 -0000 On 1/17/2017 11:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/13/2017 11:50 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: >> Because using a NFP PMD requires specific BSP installed, the PMD >> support was not the default option before. This was just for making >> people aware of such dependency, since there is no need for such a >> BSP for just compiling DPDK with NFP PMD support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero > > Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. This was breaking bsd build, patch updated to enable NFP only for Linux