From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB608E81 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:48:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so164434510wmv.1 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 06:48:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=JYoHIxSn3VQSGPy/tRRAQ3IyScgcSBmCtFwM4vAT40I=; b=DoeBh2fllmCROfZaPWKXdpsv9pHkCYoF7uLjTJ1xLaerWapKmmGd3Hpp260HLZW6eI UZW4MY2JGgNFcXn4bxGWNLwYx/vWnuyhhVXvc8adydt1rr8aH3daRqdZEYYbaq8aKz+H FHV79hKsliLPNMNq2vOMU8rBmmYFiJTZOMGovkmT0wl6qYe1RWButhNPwa7/DS6PuN72 /LseKtCXNECcQTH2pxGWqzGa3Fb0BLjdz1WNK/9W5uq50KDJIs2BCu4i1ERkPIIhJV0Y vp6wXX88y9iTM4Hz/5+dXWg6NyaPuIujh40lBZRb+Uc0N4W5VFrfNJ6Nvbx9iKLRbQRJ bfZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=JYoHIxSn3VQSGPy/tRRAQ3IyScgcSBmCtFwM4vAT40I=; b=IF4FUUu/QQEuTmy70Rv/cvcBkVgViKV312+mT196bkUVM1oOX8Wnf+SK0smgD8l8Mj B6czRdsQizKGc8/gAxr2RmLTEalTKwBXWSf39/iAaYUtotT7q1SM/W2VBuyuLWHuUEpk /iWAkbjF6rdCHp7M31mCTJqz7aznlGcQwpB1hXY3KJi3V2k0pnqdd4CkipFf84TTq2hp O9fVCQBRRDZQ+qxEVGkg6iu12aIYAdbqzfkuXgxQWaP2ThjHfHbb8Bc+scESAyv0MK+8 5hLNAFsYE60gMy1WNtofi1l5dOiwrgXMbWlNG5F9kuB7DGUfnXId42icOFV7doFMcHki ej3g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzy0F0hIQJxeYkMTnaxg2JcpUen60wVZyOSFQsGeUdY1HJ8fVcROHhXCJrd+zRtAI+4v49 X-Received: by 10.194.189.68 with SMTP id gg4mr35421037wjc.146.1448290088971; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 06:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uq3sm13640249wjc.10.2015.11.23.06.48.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 06:48:07 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Declan Doherty Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:46:52 +0100 Message-ID: <57931918.3lc4AAkY5P@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2891112.tEs81Nm6rs@xps13> References: <1447176763-19303-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <56530FB1.8000106@6wind.com> <2891112.tEs81Nm6rs@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 06/10] mbuf_offload: library to support attaching offloads to a mbuf X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:48:09 -0000 2015-11-23 15:17, Thomas Monjalon: > Yes, it is a totally new work and it probably needs more time to have a > design working well for most of use cases. > As I already discussed with Olivier, I think it should be considered as > experimental. It means we can try it but do not consider it as a stable > API. So the deprecation process would not apply until the experimental > flag is removed. If nobody complains, I'll apply this v7 and will send a patch to add some experimental markers. > For the release 2.2, it would be better to remove the crypto dependency > in mbuf. Do you think it is possible? Sorry, forget it, the dependency is in mbuf_offload.