From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0A11C00 for ; Fri, 12 May 2017 11:23:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF9F206EE; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 May 2017 05:23:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=sOGh7qf6nW/1mod bLn6NyO+G7OxeonfPfcVe0uik1Ag=; b=FrPIbCeCiXG5/1X+NA/FHarI73y1sMN tQp2TiqaSjSspINxSkfV7hJvQja8U4m1KbSNaOECkXxHY8gm3czfAL0o7+vMpoZr zyMTYYai5vhCf8YPexdeWqfLr30iFxFvdJCKtYbPVFP8grOtZUI7Ujhk9pH1/BNM 9xU3aowa0S00= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=sOGh7qf6nW/1modbLn6NyO+G7OxeonfPfcVe0uik1Ag=; b=Jaogu36g OiGydrkv8yR5lP1YnonzZLhbGNRRozV7fGXRXUmTAYzaGepFCkZ6h0QNic6PQMxO nnJAc6/STxtQPnllxrNdS6qf1+JyGQxAXsQSfEh99Ca5GpfD4nXl+mcm8Ek8054D 9SqbgwKZ4+2+GDeTEJMz7bRKB+g4yP6VGVG94h0cHY5MH96eBXJQfPSeU2h3K/yk Uesw2eat5aNgmQVb1uhy20VKiVUuiqTudauWnhKcVWR3XYn8F+EfHNwgd4Am5ujm KZgAV8z7ImzH2K9ujQ/4xLaft7tQDS/vWyktXCuvWX42iNFoCTFgW1deL/TJCXjX MCbwQZZe4VVhUg== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: bhFHzq7y4q09D5ch457L+bMppdchFQAYdsqedFv7GD0p 1494581030 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0BBE67E320; Fri, 12 May 2017 05:23:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Mcnamara, John" Cc: "Iremonger, Bernard" , dev@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:23:49 +0200 Message-ID: <5820031.igZ32l5vOD@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1494511780-5732-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D5D178@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: change doc line length limit in contributors guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:23:52 -0000 12/05/2017 11:10, Mcnamara, John: > From: Iremonger, Bernard > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > 11/05/2017 18:11, Mcnamara, John: > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > -* The recommended style for the DPDK documentation is to put > > > > > > sentences > > > > > on separate lines. > > > > > > - This allows for easier reviewing of patches. > > > > > > - Multiple sentences which are not separated by a blank line > > > > > > are joined > > > > > automatically into paragraphs, for example:: > > > > > > +* Lines in sentences should be less than 80 characters and > > > > > > +wrapped at > > > > > > + words. Multiple sentences which are not separated by a blank > > > > > > +line are joined > > > > > > + automatically into paragraphs. > > > > > > > > > > Why not keep the recommendation of separating sentences? > > > > > > > > This isn't a recommendation. It is just pointing out that lines and > > > > sentences are joined into paragraphs. Maybe that is obvious and > > > > doesn't need to be stated. > > > > > > I'm talking about "The recommended style for the DPDK documentation is > > > to put sentences on separate lines." > > > I like this recommendation. > > > > +1 for this recommendation > > > > The problem is that almost no-one follows this recommendation. > > An 80 character margin is a simple rule that most programming > editors can enforce or handle automatically. > > It is also what is recommended in OpenStack: > > https://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/rst-conv/general-guidelines.html#lines-length > > The kernel doc guidelines don't have a length rule but their docs > are wrapped at 80: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/_sources/doc-guide/sphinx.rst.txt > > The current DPDK "single sentence per line plus wrap at ~120 characters" > guideline is unusual, not supported by editors and, with rare exceptions, not > followed by anyone. > > As such I think the guidelines should reflect how people actually > write docs and submit patches, which is wrapping at 80 characters. I am OK with 80 characters. However, I think we should keep trying to explain that it is better to wrap at the end of a sentence. Example: This long sentence with a lot of words which does not mean anything will wrap at 80 characters and continue on the second line. Then a new sentence starts and ends on the third line. It would be better like that: This long sentence with a lot of words which does not mean anything will wrap at 80 characters and continue on the second line. Then a new sentence starts and ends on the third line.