From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FC0A0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:38:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28411DC88; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:38:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545681DC84 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:38:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18875C027F; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:38:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:38:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=y3U176nvqt898k7wyshXB9BLDEPkpW1v44sYzeZ7dcc=; b=dJ6H+Gge+pe+ Q84ZNEyn17bYHd0z3VFTz2oapgurDUMHY2fxWJVlorGD5Li1X11LGnotF2dPwIIj 8+8p90M12rgrHfWxzSy7xcQIoR+L9gYy8VtSUAro7MNYp2+cFRkUlTq4rGMVJZ2p FBLTxKnh5MD8JCk7fvfYBs5QdJoL4CM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=y3U176nvqt898k7wyshXB9BLDEPkpW1v44sYzeZ7d cc=; b=gunbWgMkpHLRhfazP7fL/x3Mhhk++o9R/cKxFAVFaB/uJWrFIv7TUCjHR KQG1+eCDcQHxir90iNHGlTd4FUFhB0duSXQFvKbiJes4W4Z9mzznBGcq6gZLHDMJ VNaFfzdt0Yx+rpw1sqmYmKvP9x2Vf2l+acNTIlNmQTREPI0OrSz+1X6pZPbSozBO FVxpp9NjWoTph6egElaeuHMYSd9pGIQSueO+AgXNgF9Ud1dlnyEyesdOqM96Womc EAe4sKhBZkPIscM46wPq9+rvD/tejoKckrp80kczUzf/iAm7euktJt2HR58TI+Td v/4vCP8Yw+TnrCCFu1e4AeC2vOI5A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeehgdejlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 907993280066; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:38:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:38:39 +0200 Message-ID: <5941522.F8r316W7xa@thomas> In-Reply-To: <26233198-907c-cf1c-f5ef-154d54c2ed7f@intel.com> References: <20553707.Yz81rIOvuz@thomas> <26233198-907c-cf1c-f5ef-154d54c2ed7f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] add new k32v64 hash table X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/04/2020 16:02, Medvedkin, Vladimir: > Hi Thomas, > > On 16/04/2020 10:39, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 15/04/2020 20:17, Vladimir Medvedkin: > >> Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for > >> 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback > >> is that it only supports 2 byte values. > >> The new implementation called K32V64 hash > >> supports 4 byte keys and 8 byte associated values, > >> which is enough to store a pointer. > >> > >> It would also be nice to get feedback on whether to leave the old FBK > >> and new k32v64 implementations or deprecate the old one? > >> > >> v3: > >> - added bulk lookup > >> - avx512 key comparizon is removed from .h > >> > >> v2: > >> - renamed from rte_dwk to rte_k32v64 as was suggested > >> - reworked lookup function, added inlined subroutines > >> - added avx512 key comparizon routine > >> - added documentation > >> - added statistic counters for total entries and extended entries(linked list) > > Please use --in-reply-to so we can follow version changes > > in the same email thread. > > Also I am changing the states in patchwork as superseded. > > Please remind updating status of old patches. > > > > Hmm, strange, I used --in-reply-to. Also in patchwork I can see > > In-Reply-To: Indeed, sorry my bad. I can see correct threading: http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/26233198-907c-cf1c-f5ef-154d54c2ed7f@intel.com/