From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88BAB0A7 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 17:32:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2014 08:26:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1052,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="511586282" Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.157]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2014 08:31:29 -0700 Received: from irsmsx152.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.66) by IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 14 May 2014 16:29:17 +0100 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.183]) by IRSMSX152.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.128]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 14 May 2014 16:29:16 +0100 From: "Richardson, Bruce" To: Stephen Hemminger , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions Thread-Index: AQHPb4gbYLVc3XihQUC1bk0n3/f0AptAM1AQ Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:29:16 +0000 Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B01AA19C3E@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20140514081932.37847146@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <20140514081932.37847146@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:32:31 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:20 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions >=20 > It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf can't be i= nlined > because the function supports variable number of arguments. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger >=20 Acked-by: Bruce Richardson