From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9112CB12A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:02:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2014 11:02:43 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,472,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="555196975"
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2014 11:02:41 -0700
Received: from irsmsx152.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.66) by
 IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.123.3; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 19:02:40 +0100
Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.58]) by
 IRSMSX152.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.197]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003;
 Fri, 13 Jun 2014 19:02:40 +0100
From: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Stephen Hemminger
 <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] igb_uio: cap max VFs at 7 to reserve one for PF
Thread-Index: AQHPhzAqE+tSWt1HbE+aLvZBFKv/wJtvUxjA
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:02:39 +0000
Message-ID: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B01AA36117@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20140606235028.189345212@networkplumber.org>
 <2240300.rVk2eNDOWK@xps13>
 <20140613102440.19537123@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
 <20140613175137.GS1384@x220.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20140613175137.GS1384@x220.localdomain>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: cap max VFs at 7 to reserve one for
	PF
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 18:02:29 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Wright [mailto:chrisw@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 10:52 AM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] igb_uio: cap max VFs at 7 to reserve one for PF
>=20
> To keep from confusing users, cap max VFs at 7, despite PCI SR-IOV config
> space showing a max of 8.  This reserves a queue pair for the PF.
>=20
> This issue was cited here:
>=20
>  http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-April/001832.html
>=20
> Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
> ---
>=20
> This is what Linux kernel driver does.  I have only
> compile tested it.  Stephen sending to you and Bruce
> in case you want to Ack and add to your current queue.
>=20

Sorry, NAK - at least for this implementation.

Hardcoding this to 7 is a bad idea, as the actual max number of VFs support=
ed will depend on the actual hardware used. For someone using an 82599, the=
y can have up to 64 VFs, or 63+PF, so limiting so 7 in that case is a major=
 reduction in capability. What might work there is querying the max number =
of VFs and limiting to max - 1.
However, even with that, I would suggest that any limit should be possible =
to override. It's entirely possible that someone max actually want to reser=
ve the full number of VFs, either because they don't want to use the NIC on=
 the host at all, or because they are happy to use a VF on the host instead=
. Module parameter to allow override might work - and information on it cou=
ld be added to the error message when we limit the VFs inside the driver.

/Bruce