From: "Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damarion@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>
Cc: "Chen, Jing D" <jing.d.chen@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] i40e: Enable bad checksum flags in i40e vPMD
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 07:54:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5DB5147C-414D-4B7C-880E-9EACBAD540D1@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161006021945.GA109679@ar11-dell-r730-02-jeff.jf.intel.com>
On 6 Oct 2016, at 04:19, Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com<mailto:jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:57:28PM -0700, Chen, Jing D wrote:
Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: Shaw, Jeffrey B
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 5:13 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com<mailto:helin.zhang@intel.com>>; Wu, Jingjing
<jingjing.wu@intel.com<mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com>>; damarion@cisco.com<mailto:damarion@cisco.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
<qi.z.zhang@intel.com<mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; Chen, Jing D <jing.d.chen@intel.com<mailto:jing.d.chen@intel.com>>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] i40e: Enable bad checksum flags in i40e vPMD
From: Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com<mailto:damarion@cisco.com>>
Decode the checksum flags from the rx descriptor, setting the appropriate bit
in the mbuf ol_flags field when the flag indicates a bad checksum.
Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com<mailto:damarion@cisco.com>>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com<mailto:jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
--
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec.c
b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec.c
index 6c63141..d2267ad 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec.c
@@ -138,19 +138,14 @@ i40e_rxq_rearm(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq) static
inline void desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts) {
- __m128i vlan0, vlan1, rss;
- union {
- uint16_t e[4];
- uint64_t dword;
- } vol;
+ __m128i vlan0, vlan1, rss, l3_l4e;
/* mask everything except RSS, flow director and VLAN flags
* bit2 is for VLAN tag, bit11 for flow director indication
* bit13:12 for RSS indication.
*/
- const __m128i rss_vlan_msk = _mm_set_epi16(
- 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
- 0x3804, 0x3804, 0x3804, 0x3804);
+ const __m128i rss_vlan_msk = _mm_set_epi32(
+ 0x1c03004, 0x1c03004, 0x1c03004, 0x1c03004);
Mask is wrong here. Should be 0x1c03804, ..., etc.
/* map rss and vlan type to rss hash and vlan flag */
const __m128i vlan_flags = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0, @@ -163,23
+158,36 @@ desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
PKT_RX_RSS_HASH | PKT_RX_FDIR,
PKT_RX_RSS_HASH, 0, 0,
0, 0, PKT_RX_FDIR, 0);
- vlan0 = _mm_unpackhi_epi16(descs[0], descs[1]);
- vlan1 = _mm_unpackhi_epi16(descs[2], descs[3]);
- vlan0 = _mm_unpacklo_epi32(vlan0, vlan1);
+ const __m128i l3_l4e_flags = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+ PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD
| PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
+ PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
+ PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
+ PKT_RX_EIP_CKSUM_BAD,
+ PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
+ PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
+ PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD,
+ 0);
+
+ vlan0 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs[0], descs[1]);
+ vlan1 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs[2], descs[3]);
+ vlan0 = _mm_unpacklo_epi64(vlan0, vlan1);
vlan1 = _mm_and_si128(vlan0, rss_vlan_msk);
vlan0 = _mm_shuffle_epi8(vlan_flags, vlan1);
- rss = _mm_srli_epi16(vlan1, 11);
+ rss = _mm_srli_epi32(vlan1, 12);
rss = _mm_shuffle_epi8(rss_flags, rss);
My bad. Original code will use bit[13:11] to identify RSS and FDIR flag. Now
It masked bit 11 out when creating " rss_vlan_msk" and doing shift above,
while it still try to use original "rss_flags"?
Good catch. I have no idea how you spotted that, and you're right, we should
be shifting by 11, not 12. Also the mask needs to be updated (as you
mentioned to me offline) which I noted above.
Damjan, unless you object I'll send a v3 with an updated rss_vlan_msk and
the 11 bit shift so we also get the Flow Director Filter Match (FLM)
indication.
Absolutely no objection, and thanks for taking care for that!
Damjan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-06 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-14 16:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add ptype and xsum handling in i40e rx vpmd Jeff Shaw
2016-07-14 16:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] i40e: Add packet_type metadata in the i40e vPMD Jeff Shaw
2016-09-23 6:40 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2016-09-23 8:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-26 1:46 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2016-10-05 1:29 ` Chen, Jing D
2016-10-06 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Jeff Shaw
2016-10-05 21:26 ` Chen, Jing D
2016-10-06 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] i40e: Enable bad checksum flags in " Jeff Shaw
2016-10-05 22:20 ` Chen, Jing D
2016-10-05 23:57 ` Chen, Jing D
2016-10-06 2:19 ` Jeff Shaw
2016-10-06 7:54 ` Damjan Marion (damarion) [this message]
2016-10-06 6:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] i40e: Add packet_type metadata in the " Jeff Shaw
2016-10-06 6:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Jeff Shaw
2016-10-06 6:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] i40e: Enable bad checksum flags in " Jeff Shaw
2016-10-06 15:30 ` Chen, Jing D
2016-10-06 15:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] i40e: Add packet_type metadata in the " Chen, Jing D
2016-10-12 15:51 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-07-14 16:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i40e: Enable bad checksum flags in " Jeff Shaw
2016-07-15 20:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Add ptype and xsum handling in i40e rx vpmd Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-01 14:47 ` Jeff Shaw
2016-09-14 13:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5DB5147C-414D-4B7C-880E-9EACBAD540D1@cisco.com \
--to=damarion@cisco.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com \
--cc=jing.d.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).