From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>, <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
<viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about 'rxm->hash.rss' and 'mb->hash.fdir'
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:21:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b0f7327-a089-edd1-163b-7b57cd90b575@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50258962-ee1b-e045-aba2-9ef7912a304e@intel.com>
Hi, Beilei, Matan, Shahaf, Viacheslav,
how about your opinion?
在 2021/6/30 17:34, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 6/30/2021 3:45 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> Hi, all
>> one question about 'rxm->hash.rss' and 'mb->hash.fdir'.
>>
>> In Rx recv packets function,
>> 'rxm->hash.rss' will report rss hash result from Rx desc.
>> 'rxm->hash.fdir' will report filter identifier from Rx desc.
>>
>> But function implementation differs from some PMDs. for example:
>> i40e, MLX5 report the two at the same time if pkt_flags is set,like:
>> ******************************************
>> if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH) {
>> rxm->hash.rss =
>> rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxd.wb.qword0.hi_dword.rss);
>> }
>> if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) {
>> mb->hash.fdir.hi =
>> rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.qword3.hi_dword.fd_id);
>> }
>> ********************************************
>>
>> While, ixgbe only report one of the two. like:
>> ******************************************
>> if (likely(pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH))
>> mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32(
>> rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.rss);
>> else if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) {
>> mb->hash.fdir.hash = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
>> rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum) &
>> IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK;
>> mb->hash.fdir.id = rte_le_to_cpu_16(
>> rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id);
>> }
>> ********************************************
>> So, what is application scenario for 'rxm->hash.rss' and 'mb->hash.fdir',
>> that is, why the two should be reported? How about reporting the two at the same
>> time?
>> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
> Hi Connor,
>
> mbuf->hash is union, so it is not possible to set both 'hash.rss' & 'hash.fdir'.
>
> I assume for i40e & mlx5 case 'pkt_flags' indicate which one is valid and only
> one is set in practice. Cc'ed driver mainteriners for more comment.
Thanks Ferruh,
another question, why does user need this information: rxm->hash.rss
or mb->hash.fdir.hi ? what is the function?
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 2:45 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-06-30 9:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-30 11:21 ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]
2021-06-30 11:44 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-01 0:23 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-07-01 1:31 ` Xing, Beilei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b0f7327-a089-edd1-163b-7b57cd90b575@huawei.com \
--to=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).