From: Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
To: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankumark@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/1] net/octeontx2: fix handling indirect mbufs during Tx
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:47:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b218c62-3f1b-ee58-ecf0-43a0df4319cb@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564042860-27927-1-git-send-email-skori@marvell.com>
On 7/25/2019 1:50 PM, Sunil Kumar Kori wrote:
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multi segmented packet may be spliced with indirect mbufs also.
> Currently driver causes buffer leak for indirect mbufs as they
> were not being freed to packet pool.
>
> Patch fixes handling of indirect mbufs for following use cases
> - packet contains all indirect mbufs only.
> - packet contains mixed mbufs i.e. direct and indirect both.
>
> Fixes: cbd5710db48d ("net/octeontx2: add Tx multi segment version")
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add Fixes tag
>
> drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c | 8 ++--
> drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c
> index 6bce551..0dcadff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
> mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf0 -
> offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
>
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> + if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
> vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask01, 0);
> else
> __mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
>
> mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf1 -
> offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> + if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
> vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask01, 1);
> else
> __mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@
>
> mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf2 -
> offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> + if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
> vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask23, 0);
> else
> __mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
>
> mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf3 -
> offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> + if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
> vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask23, 1);
> else
> __mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h
> index b75a220..87e747f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,72 @@
> }
> }
>
> +static __rte_always_inline uint64_t
> +otx2_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> + struct rte_mempool *mp = m->pool;
> + uint32_t mbuf_size, buf_len;
> + struct rte_mbuf *md;
> + uint16_t priv_size;
> + uint16_t refcount;
> +
> + /* Update refcount of direct mbuf */
> + md = rte_mbuf_from_indirect(m);
> + refcount = rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, -1);
> +
> + priv_size = rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(mp);
> + mbuf_size = (uint32_t)(sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) + priv_size);
> + buf_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mp);
> +
> + m->priv_size = priv_size;
> + m->buf_addr = (char *)m + mbuf_size;
> + m->buf_iova = rte_mempool_virt2iova(m) + mbuf_size;
> + m->buf_len = (uint16_t)buf_len;
> + rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(m);
> + m->data_len = 0;
> + m->ol_flags = 0;
> + m->next = NULL;
> + m->nb_segs = 1;
> +
> + /* Now indirect mbuf is safe to free */
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> +
> + if (refcount == 0) {
> + rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(md, 1);
> + md->data_len = 0;
> + md->ol_flags = 0;
> + md->next = NULL;
> + md->nb_segs = 1;
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + return 1;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline uint64_t
> +otx2_nix_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> + if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1)) {
> + if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
> + return otx2_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +
> + m->next = NULL;
> + m->nb_segs = 1;
> + return 0;
> + } else if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) {
> + if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
> + return otx2_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +
> + rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1);
> + m->next = NULL;
> + m->nb_segs = 1;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Mbuf is having refcount more than 1 so need not to be freed */
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> otx2_nix_xmit_prepare(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint64_t *cmd, const uint16_t flags)
> {
> @@ -189,9 +255,11 @@
> *(rte_iova_t *)(++sg) = rte_mbuf_data_iova(m);
>
> if (flags & NIX_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_NOFF_F) {
> - /* Set don't free bit if reference count > 1 */
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m) == NULL)
> - send_hdr->w0.df = 1; /* SET DF */
> + /* DF bit = 1 if refcount of current mbuf or parent mbuf
> + * is greater than 1
> + * DF bit = 0 otherwise
> + */
> + send_hdr->w0.df = otx2_nix_prefree_seg(m);
> }
> /* Mark mempool object as "put" since it is freed by NIX */
> if (!send_hdr->w0.df)
> @@ -233,6 +301,8 @@
> off = 0;
>
> sg = (union nix_send_sg_s *)&cmd[2 + off];
> + /* Clear sg->u header before use */
> + sg->u &= 0xFC00000000000000;
> sg_u = sg->u;
> slist = &cmd[3 + off];
>
> @@ -244,11 +314,9 @@
> m_next = m->next;
> sg_u = sg_u | ((uint64_t)m->data_len << (i << 4));
> *slist = rte_mbuf_data_iova(m);
> - /* Set invert df if reference count > 1 */
> + /* Set invert df if buffer is not to be freed by H/W */
> if (flags & NIX_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_NOFF_F)
> - sg_u |=
> - ((uint64_t)(rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m) == NULL) <<
> - (i + 55));
> + sg_u |= (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(m) << (i + 55));
> /* Mark mempool object as "put" since it is freed by NIX */
> if (!(sg_u & (1ULL << (i + 55)))) {
> m->next = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-27 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 5:43 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx2: fix handling indirect mbufs during TX Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-07-25 8:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] net/octeontx2: fix handling indirect mbufs during Tx Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-07-27 13:47 ` Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram [this message]
2019-07-28 16:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b218c62-3f1b-ee58-ecf0-43a0df4319cb@marvell.com \
--to=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
--cc=skori@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).