DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
To: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankumark@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/1] net/octeontx2: fix handling indirect mbufs during Tx
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:47:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b218c62-3f1b-ee58-ecf0-43a0df4319cb@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564042860-27927-1-git-send-email-skori@marvell.com>



On 7/25/2019 1:50 PM, Sunil Kumar Kori wrote:
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multi segmented packet may be spliced with indirect mbufs also.
> Currently driver causes buffer leak for indirect mbufs as they
> were not being freed to packet pool.
>
> Patch fixes handling of indirect mbufs for following use cases
> - packet contains all indirect mbufs only.
> - packet contains mixed mbufs i.e. direct and indirect both.
>
> Fixes: cbd5710db48d ("net/octeontx2: add Tx multi segment version")
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> ---
> v2:
>   - Add Fixes tag
>
>   drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c |  8 ++--
>   drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c
> index 6bce551..0dcadff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
>   			mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf0 -
>   				offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
>   
> -			if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> +			if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
>   				vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask01, 0);
>   			else
>   				__mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
>   
>   			mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf1 -
>   				offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
> -			if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> +			if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
>   				vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask01, 1);
>   			else
>   				__mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@
>   
>   			mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf2 -
>   				offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
> -			if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> +			if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
>   				vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask23, 0);
>   			else
>   				__mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
>   
>   			mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uintptr_t)mbuf3 -
>   				offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, buf_iova));
> -			if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) == NULL)
> +			if (otx2_nix_prefree_seg(mbuf))
>   				vsetq_lane_u64(0x80000, xmask23, 1);
>   			else
>   				__mempool_check_cookies(mbuf->pool,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h
> index b75a220..87e747f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_tx.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,72 @@
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static __rte_always_inline uint64_t
> +otx2_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mempool *mp = m->pool;
> +	uint32_t mbuf_size, buf_len;
> +	struct rte_mbuf *md;
> +	uint16_t priv_size;
> +	uint16_t refcount;
> +
> +	/* Update refcount of direct mbuf */
> +	md = rte_mbuf_from_indirect(m);
> +	refcount = rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, -1);
> +
> +	priv_size = rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(mp);
> +	mbuf_size = (uint32_t)(sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) + priv_size);
> +	buf_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mp);
> +
> +	m->priv_size = priv_size;
> +	m->buf_addr = (char *)m + mbuf_size;
> +	m->buf_iova = rte_mempool_virt2iova(m) + mbuf_size;
> +	m->buf_len = (uint16_t)buf_len;
> +	rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(m);
> +	m->data_len = 0;
> +	m->ol_flags = 0;
> +	m->next = NULL;
> +	m->nb_segs = 1;
> +
> +	/* Now indirect mbuf is safe to free */
> +	rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> +
> +	if (refcount == 0) {
> +		rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(md, 1);
> +		md->data_len = 0;
> +		md->ol_flags = 0;
> +		md->next = NULL;
> +		md->nb_segs = 1;
> +		return 0;
> +	} else {
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline uint64_t
> +otx2_nix_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> +	if (likely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1)) {
> +		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
> +			return otx2_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +
> +		m->next = NULL;
> +		m->nb_segs = 1;
> +		return 0;
> +	} else if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) {
> +		if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))
> +			return otx2_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> +
> +		rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1);
> +		m->next = NULL;
> +		m->nb_segs = 1;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Mbuf is having refcount more than 1 so need not to be freed */
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
>   static inline void
>   otx2_nix_xmit_prepare(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint64_t *cmd, const uint16_t flags)
>   {
> @@ -189,9 +255,11 @@
>   		*(rte_iova_t *)(++sg) = rte_mbuf_data_iova(m);
>   
>   		if (flags & NIX_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_NOFF_F) {
> -			/* Set don't free bit if reference count > 1 */
> -			if (rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m) == NULL)
> -				send_hdr->w0.df = 1; /* SET DF */
> +			/* DF bit = 1 if refcount of current mbuf or parent mbuf
> +			 *		is greater than 1
> +			 * DF bit = 0 otherwise
> +			 */
> +			send_hdr->w0.df = otx2_nix_prefree_seg(m);
>   		}
>   		/* Mark mempool object as "put" since it is freed by NIX */
>   		if (!send_hdr->w0.df)
> @@ -233,6 +301,8 @@
>   		off = 0;
>   
>   	sg = (union nix_send_sg_s *)&cmd[2 + off];
> +	/* Clear sg->u header before use */
> +	sg->u &= 0xFC00000000000000;
>   	sg_u = sg->u;
>   	slist = &cmd[3 + off];
>   
> @@ -244,11 +314,9 @@
>   		m_next = m->next;
>   		sg_u = sg_u | ((uint64_t)m->data_len << (i << 4));
>   		*slist = rte_mbuf_data_iova(m);
> -		/* Set invert df if reference count > 1 */
> +		/* Set invert df if buffer is not to be freed by H/W */
>   		if (flags & NIX_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_NOFF_F)
> -			sg_u |=
> -			((uint64_t)(rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m) == NULL) <<
> -			 (i + 55));
> +			sg_u |=	(otx2_nix_prefree_seg(m) << (i + 55));
>   		/* Mark mempool object as "put" since it is freed by NIX */
>   		if (!(sg_u & (1ULL << (i + 55)))) {
>   			m->next = NULL;


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-27 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25  5:43 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/octeontx2: fix handling indirect mbufs during TX Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-07-25  8:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] net/octeontx2: fix handling indirect mbufs during Tx Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-07-27 13:47   ` Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram [this message]
2019-07-28 16:08     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b218c62-3f1b-ee58-ecf0-43a0df4319cb@marvell.com \
    --to=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).