From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7C51B19F for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2017 07:55:08 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,413,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="1173320661" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.57]) ([10.237.220.57]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2017 07:55:06 -0700 To: Shreyansh Jain , dev@dpdk.org Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com References: <20170823141213.25476-1-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <20170909112132.13936-1-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <20170909112132.13936-26-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <5b28593b-5d6c-f77a-80a2-9e8332820b8e@intel.com> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:55:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170909112132.13936-26-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 25/41] net/dpaa: add support for Tx and Rx queue setup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:55:10 -0000 On 9/9/2017 12:21 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <...> > + for (loop = 0; loop < num_cores; loop++) { > + ret = dpaa_tx_queue_init(&dpaa_intf->tx_queues[loop], > + fman_intf); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + dpaa_intf->tx_queues[loop].dpaa_intf = dpaa_intf; > + } > + dpaa_intf->nb_tx_queues = num_cores; Is number of the tx_queues always same as core count? > + > + DPAA_PMD_DEBUG("All frame queues created"); > + > + /* reset bpool list, initialize bpool dynamically */ > + list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, tmp_bp, &cfg->fman_if->bpool_list, node) { > + list_del(&bp->node); > + rte_free(bp); Why freeing them during initialization ? > + } > + > + /* Populate ethdev structure */ > eth_dev->dev_ops = &dpaa_devops; > + eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = dpaa_eth_queue_rx; > + eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = dpaa_eth_tx_drop_all; > + > + /* Allocate memory for storing MAC addresses */ > + eth_dev->data->mac_addrs = rte_zmalloc("mac_addr", > + ETHER_ADDR_LEN * DPAA_MAX_MAC_FILTER, 0); > + if (eth_dev->data->mac_addrs == NULL) { > + DPAA_PMD_ERR("Failed to allocate %d bytes needed to " > + "store MAC addresses", > + ETHER_ADDR_LEN * DPAA_MAX_MAC_FILTER); free dpaa_intf->rx_queues, tx_queues ? > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + /* copy the primary mac address */ > + memcpy(eth_dev->data->mac_addrs[0].addr_bytes, > + fman_intf->mac_addr.addr_bytes, > + ETHER_ADDR_LEN); Instead can use ether_addr_copy() instead. <...>