From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
"Shahaf Shuler" <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/4] net/mlx5: fix flow single queue
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:16:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b296774-aec3-b600-e215-7756579654ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180328113419.g3rmsgcuzn2hpudf@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com>
On 3/28/2018 12:34 PM, Nélio Laranjeiro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:13:42AM +0000, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
>> Wednesday, March 28, 2018 12:05 PM, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 3/21/2018 6:45 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>> On 3/13/2018 2:17 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
>>>>> The flow is created with any steering being applied in the NIC when
>>>>> the device is handling a single Rx queue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: cede123a158f ("net/mlx5: fix flow creation with a single
>>>>> target queue")
>>>>
>>>> This patch is from current release and still in next-net. If it is
>>>> possible to split this patch to fix issue in this particular commit it
>>>> can be squashed into original fix.
>>>
>>
>> We can say it only fixes the above and squash the commits.
>
> Indeed they are fixing the same issue.
Can you please confirm it is safe to squash this commit [1] into [2]?
[1]: ebfe9a38cb47 ("net/mlx5: fix flow single queue")
[2]: cede123a158f ("net/mlx5: fix flow creation with a single target queue")
>
>>> Cc'ed Shahaf.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If not commit id for fixes will be wrong and needs to be fixed when
>>>> merged into main repo.
>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 8086cf08b2f0 ("net/mlx5: handle RSS hash configuration in RSS
>>>>> flow")
>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
>>>>
>>>> <...>
>>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 9:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: change tunnel flow priority Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-02-16 11:17 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-03-13 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: multiple fix and improvements in flows Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-03-21 14:53 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-03-13 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/mlx5: change tunnel flow priority Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-03-13 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/mlx5: fix flow single queue Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-03-21 18:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-28 9:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-28 11:13 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-03-28 11:34 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2018-03-28 13:16 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-03-28 15:09 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2018-03-28 16:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-13 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/mlx5: improve flow error explanation Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-03-13 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/mlx5: refuse empty VLAN flow specification Nelio Laranjeiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b296774-aec3-b600-e215-7756579654ec@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).