From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7EC370 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:33:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2016 09:33:12 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,347,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1099146790" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.29]) ([10.237.220.29]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2016 09:33:11 -0800 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>, dev@dpdk.org References: <cover.1481590851.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> <d1c6dd8ca22b51b781b2ce9f305f6a39ba9a914b.1481590851.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Message-ID: <5b69bbf4-f570-26c4-79e4-c3342769d81d@intel.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:33:11 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <d1c6dd8ca22b51b781b2ce9f305f6a39ba9a914b.1481590851.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/13] KNI: guard against unterminated dev_info.name leading to BUG in alloc_netdev() X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:33:14 -0000 On 12/13/2016 1:08 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <michal.miroslaw@atendesoftware.pl> > --- Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> I guess no harm doing extra check on user input.