From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 20.05] ethdev: clear struct on releasing port
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:16:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ba0db1f-f530-f25f-b9fa-521ed9921c7e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213143312.1021487-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
On 2/13/2020 2:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The function rte_eth_dev_release_port() is called by drivers
> when closing or removing a device.
> Its main usage should be via rte_eth_dev_close() by up-to-date
> drivers which are compliant with RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE flag.
>
> When a port is released, the data (rte_eth_dev_data) are cleared,
> but the pointers in rte_eth_dev were not cleared.
> It may cause issues with code paths trying to use dangling pointers
> (e.g. the .device pointer which may reference a removed rte_device).
> Everything is now cleared to 0 when releasing.
> The state is explicitly set to RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED which is 0 anyway.
>
> Using this patch may reveal bugs in some code paths:
> - device pointer must be saved before closing a port if needed
Is this saving should be done in application code or will be done by ethdev?
> - drivers must close ports on device remove for consistent cleanup
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> ---
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index 774c721b34..2a43a9abe9 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -553,8 +553,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_release_port(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>
> rte_spinlock_lock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
>
> - eth_dev->state = RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED;
> -
> if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> rte_free(eth_dev->data->rx_queues);
> rte_free(eth_dev->data->tx_queues);
> @@ -563,6 +561,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_release_port(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> memset(eth_dev->data, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_data));
> }
> + memset(eth_dev, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev));
> + eth_dev->state = RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED;
>
> rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 14:33 Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-13 15:16 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-02-13 15:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-13 16:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-13 19:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ba0db1f-f530-f25f-b9fa-521ed9921c7e@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).