From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5336D1B96C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 16:30:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2018 07:30:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,432,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="49608887" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.42]) ([10.237.221.42]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2018 07:30:51 -0700 To: Ophir Munk , "dev@dpdk.org" , Pascal Mazon Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Olga Shern References: <1520629826-23055-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=ferruh.yigit@intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFXZCFABEADCujshBOAaqPZpwShdkzkyGpJ15lmxiSr3jVMqOtQS/sB3FYLT0/d3+bvy qbL9YnlbPyRvZfnP3pXiKwkRoR1RJwEo2BOf6hxdzTmLRtGtwWzI9MwrUPj6n/ldiD58VAGQ +iR1I/z9UBUN/ZMksElA2D7Jgg7vZ78iKwNnd+vLBD6I61kVrZ45Vjo3r+pPOByUBXOUlxp9 GWEKKIrJ4eogqkVNSixN16VYK7xR+5OUkBYUO+sE6etSxCr7BahMPKxH+XPlZZjKrxciaWQb +dElz3Ab4Opl+ZT/bK2huX+W+NJBEBVzjTkhjSTjcyRdxvS1gwWRuXqAml/sh+KQjPV1PPHF YK5LcqLkle+OKTCa82OvUb7cr+ALxATIZXQkgmn+zFT8UzSS3aiBBohg3BtbTIWy51jNlYdy ezUZ4UxKSsFuUTPt+JjHQBvF7WKbmNGS3fCid5Iag4tWOfZoqiCNzxApkVugltxoc6rG2TyX CmI2rP0mQ0GOsGXA3+3c1MCdQFzdIn/5tLBZyKy4F54UFo35eOX8/g7OaE+xrgY/4bZjpxC1 1pd66AAtKb3aNXpHvIfkVV6NYloo52H+FUE5ZDPNCGD0/btFGPWmWRmkPybzColTy7fmPaGz cBcEEqHK4T0aY4UJmE7Ylvg255Kz7s6wGZe6IR3N0cKNv++O7QARAQABzSVGZXJydWggWWln aXQgPGZlcnJ1aC55aWdpdEBpbnRlbC5jb20+wsF+BBMBAgAoAhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCWZR1xgUJB33UawAKCRD5M+tD3xNhH3TID/wNjq1doFXg49WaM7ZXez/1 qwj7U6FQ2eUhlEPX8dXc52cu+iQk8/mssXQtANEx+jndxfvlkikBNgI+mr3m/ho54uQWFZd7 Bv0DVVkLHNkLWK6tT6iISdCgXrQuOv8y5rucEGkJ8dDPsp8Mqr4sBjavRBpczphoa3miKusA HzUEo0SYuHUPmBlbmvKv4PkA5quWtXpkgV2HZ1bW9X0dQkAqEVioAPm5Q6pXJODfV8kaZUtJ z4swEtBnK9XAWm2HccF7KmFh0vv+Zh9lEMnEFt7UPXngY6+xCTo6xV1IVc8EZfDjOip8I4h2 ALMaLgrZwA9VVmHCVOrnO3UZqfGehrwz4O3sUrcmIzxjk3gfBmVRCBfuWGchSpWtZ99U6V1a OEuG+ymyjBDtyymW+KSvmCBl2gIxZHvZFvSRRdDObkkUIskSJ95f/6HBOESRZBOiV9GEAhC5 gI9OAKKF8HQaN/r5KJrkzscjQcjIdV1jXhTkfQ4wH3GJiVM5JxsKsEjjRw7yfSJo2GBEGqMe KMwMLWg4f1DgVtjOuGf10isu+29MvapW2IxKYaHcVc2vHfWbDi2AvBj/VAzKILWbTEgI1VL5 zKpo5p6X2O55oEyeflDiAzrUfvLqB4vmTyqXtW6PdLyZC7kXIzmNu6EBVx9oSgy3CADw5saN 0La9OoCAc7Tn+s7BTQRX1ky+ARAApzQNvXvE2q1LAS+Z+ni2R13Bb1cDS1ZYq1jgpR13+OKN ipzd8MPngRJilXxBaPTErhgzR0vGcNTYhjGMSyFIHVOoBq1VbP1a0Fi/NqWzJOowo/fDfgVy K4vuitc/gCJs+2se4hdZA4EQJxVlNM51lgYDNpjPGIA43MX15OLAip73+ho6NPBMuc5qse3X pAClNhBKfENRCWN428pi3WVkT+ABRTE0taxjJNP7bb+9TQYNRqGwnGzX5/XISv44asWIQCaq vOkXSUJLd//cdVNTqtL1wreCVVR5pMXj7VIrlk07fmmJVALCmGbFr53BMb8O+8dgK2A5mitM n44d+8KdJWOwziRxcaMk/LclmZS3Iv1TERtiWt98Y9AjeAtcgYPkA3ld0BcUKONogP8pHVz1 Ed3s5rDQ91yr1S0wuAzW91fxGUO4wY+uPmxCtFVuBgd9VT9NAKTUL0qHM7CDgCnZPe0TW6Zj 8OqtdCCyAfvU9cW5xWM7Icxhde6AtPxhDSBwE8fL2ZmrDmaA4jmUKXp3i4JxRPSX84S08b+s DWXHPxy10UFU5A7EK/BEbZAKBwn9ROfm+WK+6X5xOGLoRE++OqNuUudxC1GDyLOPaqCbBCS9 +P6HsTHzxsjyJa27n4jcrcuY3P9TEcFJYSZSeSDh8mVGvugi0exnSJrrBZDyVCcAEQEAAcLB ZQQYAQIADwIbDAUCWZR1ZwUJA59cIQAKCRD5M+tD3xNhH5b+D/9XG44Ci6STdcA5RO/ur05J EE3Ux1DCHZ5V7vNAtX/8Wg4l4GZfweauXwuJ1w7Sp7fklwcNC6wsceI+EmNjGMqfIaukGetG +jBGqsQ7moOZodfXUoCK98gblKgt/BPYMVidzlGC8Q/+lZg1+o29sPnwImW+MXt/Z5az/Z17 Qc265g+p5cqJHzq6bpQdnF7Fu6btKU/kv6wJghENvgMXBuyThqsyFReJWFh2wfaKyuix3Zyj ccq7/blkhzIKmtFWgDcgaSc2UAuJU+x9nuYjihW6WobpKP/nlUDu3BIsbIq09UEke+uE/QK+ FJ8PTJkAsXOf1Bc2C0XbW4Y2hf103+YY6L8weUCBsWC5VH5VtVmeuh26ENURclwfeXhWQ9Og 77yzpTXWr5g1Z0oLpYpWPv745J4bE7pv+dzxOrFdM1xNkzY2pvXph/A8OjxZNQklDkHQ7PIB Lki5L2F4XkEOddUUQchJwzMqTPsggPDmGjgLZrqgO+s4ECZK5+nLD3HEpAbPa3JLDaScy+90 Nu1lAqPUHSnP3vYZVw85ZYm6UCxHE4VLMnnJsN09ZhsOSVR+GyP5Nyw9rT1V3lcsuH7M5Naa 2Xobn9m7l9bRCD/Ji8kG15eV1WTxx1HXVQGjdUYDI7UwegBNbwMLh17XDy+3sn/6SgcqtECA Q6pZKA2mTQxEKA== Message-ID: <5d6958c0-34a3-ca45-c9b9-f9db65f92098@intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:30:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] TAP TSO Implementation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:30:54 -0000 On 4/9/2018 11:37 PM, Ophir Munk wrote: > Patch sent for this release. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com] >> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 7:39 PM >> To: Ophir Munk ; dev@dpdk.org; Pascal Mazon >> >> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Olga Shern >> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] TAP TSO Implementation >> >> On 3/9/2018 9:10 PM, Ophir Munk wrote: >>> This RFC suggests TAP TSO (TSP segmentation offload) implementation in >> SW. >>> It uses dpdk library rte_gso which is also used by testpmd. >>> Dpdk rte_gso library segments large TCP payloads (e.g. 64K bytes) into >>> smaller MTU size buffers. >>> By supporting TSO offload capability in software a TAP device can be >>> used as a failsafe sub device and be paired with another PCI device >>> which supports TSO capability in HW. >>> >>> This RFC includes 2 commits: >>> 1. Calculation of IP/TCP/UDP checksums for multi segments packets. >>> Previously checksum offload was skipped if the number of packet >>> segments was greater than 1. >>> This commit removes this limitation. It is required before supporting >>> TAP TSO since the generated small TCP packets may be composed by >>> themselves by more than one segment. >>> 2. Core TAP TSO implementation: calling rte_gso_segment() segments >>> large TCP packets. >>> To be added: creation of a small private mbuf pool in TAP required by >> librte_gso. >>> The number of buffers will be 64 - each of 128 bytes length. >>> >>> Ophir Munk (2): >>> net/tap: calculate checksum for multi segs packets >>> net/tap: implement TAP TSO >> >> This is an RFC, and V1 not sent for the patch, is this still valid for this release >> or should we push into next one? > > V1 was sent for this release: > https://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/37757/ "was sent" :) that patch is same date with this mail...