From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] eal/vfio: export internal vfio functions
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:22:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60929980.gmd1JhcyUE@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B7F2E978279D1D49A3034B7786DACF406F86D36D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
05/04/2018 11:03, Wang, Xiao W:
> > +int rte_vfio_get_group_num(const char *sysfs_base, const char *dev_addr,
> > + int *iommu_group_num);
> > +int rte_vfio_get_container_fd(void);
> > +int rte_vfio_get_group_fd(int iommu_group_num);
>
> Considering the "group_no" field defined in eal_vfio.h, will "iommu_group_num" cause inconsistency
> In naming?
I asked to change the function name to "num" because it is more meaningful.
"group_no" field is private? Can it be renamed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-05 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 8:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Hemant Agrawal
2018-03-14 10:19 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-27 15:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-03 6:27 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-03 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-03 8:34 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-02 8:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-02 16:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-03 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] doc: add vfio api support Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-03 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal/vfio: export internal vfio functions Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-03 10:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] doc: add vfio api support Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-03 11:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-03 11:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal/vfio: export internal vfio functions Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-03 12:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-03 12:59 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-03 15:23 ` Wang, Xiao W
2018-04-04 6:47 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-04 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] doc: add vfio api support Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-04 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] eal/vfio: export internal vfio functions Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-05 9:03 ` Wang, Xiao W
2018-04-05 10:22 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-04-05 10:35 ` Wang, Xiao W
2018-04-11 21:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-12 6:26 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-12 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] doc: add vfio api support Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-12 6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal/vfio: export internal vfio functions Hemant Agrawal
2018-04-12 23:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60929980.gmd1JhcyUE@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).