From: "Jastrzebski, MichalX K" <michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
"Azarewicz, PiotrX T" <piotrx.t.azarewicz@intel.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Kerlin, MarcinX" <marcinx.kerlin@intel.com>,
"Mrozowicz, SlawomirX" <slawomirx.mrozowicz@intel.com>,
"Kobylinski, MichalX" <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>,
"Kulasek, TomaszX" <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>,
"Mrzyglod, DanielX T" <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] libcrypto_pmd: initial implementation of SW crypto device
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:48:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB158213AEEE33@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d920e7a-cebc-4ece-e5a2-dccfc3e66a3b@nxp.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Akhil Goyal
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 1:17 PM
> To: Azarewicz, PiotrX T <piotrx.t.azarewicz@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan
> <declan.doherty@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Kerlin, MarcinX <marcinx.kerlin@intel.com>; Mrozowicz, SlawomirX
> <slawomirx.mrozowicz@intel.com>; Kobylinski, MichalX
> <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>; Kulasek, TomaszX
> <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>; Mrzyglod, DanielX T
> <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] libcrypto_pmd: initial implementation
> of SW crypto device
>
> On 8/26/2016 12:51 PM, Piotr Azarewicz wrote:
>
> > +/** Provide session for operation */
> > +static struct libcrypto_session *
> > +get_session(struct libcrypto_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op *op)
> > +{
> > + struct libcrypto_session *sess = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (op->sym->sess_type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_OP_WITH_SESSION) {
> > + /* get existing session */
> > + if (!unlikely(op->sym->session == NULL ||
> > + op->sym->session->dev_type !=
> > + RTE_CRYPTODEV_LIBCRYPTO_PMD))
> > + sess = (struct libcrypto_session *)
> > + op->sym->session->_private;
> > + } else {
> > + /* provide internal session */
> > + void *_sess = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!rte_mempool_get(qp->sess_mp, (void **)&_sess)) {
> > + sess = (struct libcrypto_session *)
> > + ((struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session *)_sess)
> > + ->_private;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(libcrypto_set_session_parameters(
> > + sess, op->sym->xform) != 0)) {
> > + rte_mempool_put(qp->sess_mp, _sess);
> > + sess = NULL;
> > + } else
> > + op->sym->session = _sess;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (sess == NULL)
> > + op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_INVALID_SESSION;
> > +
> > + return sess;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + *------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + * Process Operations
> > + *------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + */
> > +
> > +/** Process standard libcrypto cipher encryption */
> > +static int
> > +process_libcrypto_cipher_encrypt(uint8_t *src, uint8_t *dst,
> > + uint8_t *iv, uint8_t *key, int srclen,
> > + EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *algo)
> > +{
> > + int dstlen, totlen;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, algo, NULL, key, iv) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_encrypt_err;
> [Akhil] this EVP_EncryptInit_ex() can be done for each session instead
> of each packet. This will improve the performance. Also if there is some
> change in the parameters later then it can be called again here with the
> updated parameters only.
> Same comment is for all cases (hmac, auth, etc)
Hi Akhil,
Thank You for this comment. We will check if this is possible.
Michal
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, dst, &dstlen, src, srclen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_encrypt_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, dst + dstlen, &totlen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_encrypt_err;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +process_cipher_encrypt_err:
> > + LIBCRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Process libcrypto cipher encrypt failed");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/** Process standard libcrypto cipher decryption */
> > +static int
> > +process_libcrypto_cipher_decrypt(uint8_t *src, uint8_t *dst,
> > + uint8_t *iv, uint8_t *key, int srclen,
> > + EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *algo)
> > +{
> > + int dstlen, totlen;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DecryptInit_ex(ctx, algo, NULL, key, iv) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_decrypt_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_padding(ctx, 0) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_decrypt_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DecryptUpdate(ctx, dst, &dstlen, src, srclen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_decrypt_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DecryptFinal_ex(ctx, dst + dstlen, &totlen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_decrypt_err;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +process_cipher_decrypt_err:
> > + LIBCRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Process libcrypto cipher decrypt failed");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/** Process cipher des 3 ctr encryption, decryption algorithm */
> > +static int
> > +process_libcrypto_cipher_des3ctr(uint8_t *src, uint8_t *dst,
> > + uint8_t *iv, uint8_t *key, int srclen, EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx)
> > +{
> > + uint8_t ebuf[8], ctr[8];
> > + int unused, n;
> > +
> > + /* We use 3DES encryption also for decryption.
> > + * IV is not important for 3DES ecb
> > + */
> > + if (EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_des_ede3_ecb(), NULL, key, NULL) <=
> 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_des3ctr_err;
> > +
> > + memcpy(ctr, iv, 8);
> > + n = 0;
> > +
> > + while (n < srclen) {
> > + if (n % 8 == 0) {
> > + if (EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, (unsigned char *)&ebuf,
> &unused,
> > + (const unsigned char *)&ctr, 8) <= 0)
> > + goto process_cipher_des3ctr_err;
> > + ctr_inc(ctr);
> > + }
> > + dst[n] = src[n] ^ ebuf[n % 8];
> > + n++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +process_cipher_des3ctr_err:
> > + LIBCRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Process libcrypto cipher des 3 ede ctr failed");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/** Process auth gmac algorithm */
> > +static int
> > +process_libcrypto_auth_gmac(uint8_t *src, uint8_t *dst,
> > + uint8_t *iv, uint8_t *key, int srclen, int ivlen,
> > + EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *algo)
> > +{
> > + int unused;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, algo, NULL, NULL, NULL) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_gmac_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_CIPHER_CTX_ctrl(ctx, EVP_CTRL_GCM_SET_IVLEN, ivlen,
> NULL) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_gmac_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptInit_ex(ctx, NULL, NULL, key, iv) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_gmac_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptUpdate(ctx, NULL, &unused, src, srclen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_gmac_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_EncryptFinal_ex(ctx, NULL, &unused) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_gmac_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_CIPHER_CTX_ctrl(ctx, EVP_CTRL_GCM_GET_TAG, 16, dst) <=
> 0)
> > + goto process_auth_gmac_err;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +process_auth_gmac_err:
> > + LIBCRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Process libcrypto auth gmac failed");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/** Process standard libcrypto auth algorithms */
> > +static int
> > +process_libcrypto_auth(uint8_t *src, uint8_t *dst,
> > + __rte_unused uint8_t *iv, __rte_unused EVP_PKEY * pkey,
> > + int srclen, EVP_MD_CTX *ctx, const EVP_MD *algo)
> > +{
> > + size_t dstlen;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DigestInit_ex(ctx, algo, NULL) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DigestUpdate(ctx, (char *)src, srclen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DigestFinal_ex(ctx, dst, (unsigned int *)&dstlen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_err;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +process_auth_err:
> > + LIBCRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Process libcrypto auth failed");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/** Process standard libcrypto auth algorithms with hmac */
> > +static int
> > +process_libcrypto_auth_hmac(uint8_t *src, uint8_t *dst,
> > + __rte_unused uint8_t *iv, EVP_PKEY *pkey,
> > + int srclen, EVP_MD_CTX *ctx, const EVP_MD *algo)
> > +{
> > + size_t dstlen;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DigestSignInit(ctx, NULL, algo, NULL, pkey) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DigestSignUpdate(ctx, (char *)src, srclen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_err;
> > +
> > + if (EVP_DigestSignFinal(ctx, dst, &dstlen) <= 0)
> > + goto process_auth_err;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +process_auth_err:
> > + LIBCRYPTO_LOG_ERR("Process libcrypto auth failed");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> > +
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-26 7:21 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New crypto software based device Piotr Azarewicz
2016-08-26 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] libcrypto_pmd: initial implementation of SW crypto device Piotr Azarewicz
[not found] ` <CAOysbxoNTyTkz2A9oteLj2LfExObqnjSSsQK=s6p0kVuaEcS9g@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-08 15:50 ` Zbigniew Bodek
2016-09-12 11:16 ` Akhil Goyal
2016-09-14 8:48 ` Jastrzebski, MichalX K [this message]
2016-10-11 9:50 ` Mrozowicz, SlawomirX
2016-08-26 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] lib/cryptodev: added support to libcrypto PMD Piotr Azarewicz
2016-08-26 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] app/test: added tests for " Piotr Azarewicz
2016-08-26 7:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l2fwd-crypto: updated example " Piotr Azarewicz
2016-09-07 18:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New crypto software based device De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60ABE07DBB3A454EB7FAD707B4BB158213AEEE33@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=marcinx.kerlin@intel.com \
--cc=michalx.kobylinski@intel.com \
--cc=piotrx.t.azarewicz@intel.com \
--cc=slawomirx.mrozowicz@intel.com \
--cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).