From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFAFA0C41; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4534003F; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9E34003E for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:29:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7436C5C0180; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:29:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:29:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= j+jUjFUiH0nq0vy2HvFOk6yYPe9TBiWTWviUaCKqONE=; b=oVnzksxqRt35pibc IT3CsoBT8IHO/aL6xnbbz8OhyUEH/IU+xAWkQQffDTNrMGMtkvSai01jvXE0w2p3 ohjQbx2e9ZnLQKI/W106Vz+Y6jbzLu2ukRCk4CigXW170BBlwebf0CdecYtklcHe QcxObTiKwYxqGENHcFw9mFm0jurPUb28kwc3rdi27Wgke6UyJqIxSb7xgL5fTPKD FXzztj3RRf2etb4zYAFx93TpabjXs4S7vVRZrl9O/jTmjDjI14m/TnmebuSi9oIL PDqjGbms/+T/0Mbe2fidqzjpaPLJ+zkSxILzV3b9expyecHMQ2088/34QV+g0Wg/ b6+L/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=j+jUjFUiH0nq0vy2HvFOk6yYPe9TBiWTWviUaCKqO NE=; b=siQGqWfZ/eY+Qc+acMVNxfC/mfDxWRxpZVSAEgq0llhZZE2Ulb9UBTbu2 SuIwIyIwmz4jrqL74849XdZCIQu72UnWTXIMnhx9+4EYRRvv9VIGayvST/jiNZ2Q JzxNHQnKH8nfFhdYH3Z9KzOXVYcfCM2FJaF9owAtOSbzlZSrYJcAJCv8wj7lNv/P nqOd7vdOGLmaYocKQNn3LR5TNCm1Joh7WcoVT6eCA/2Bk7KG+UZr+KcQEsa4Ax+D 0JAOP4jFAI9IdlbN5joVkPfVMT9eXVaOI6wwvh0ehF1AUf+5v4mE+0qwhVaVn2T2 aNrXx8M2AEjo8xvjLjzmeGF4XObAQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeegvddgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:29:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Chengwen Feng Cc: "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , dev@dpdk.org, "viktorin@rehivetech.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , nd , Ruifeng Wang Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: <6132179.B3tZ8S0eLa@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1621568034-29269-1-git-send-email-fengchengwen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config/arm: add checking SVE cpuflag X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > If compiled with SVE feature (e.g. "-march=armv8.2-a+sve'), the binary could > > not run on non-SVE platform else it will encounter illegal instruction [1]. > > > > This patch fixes it by add 'RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE' to compile_time_cpuflags, so > > that rte_cpu_is_supported() will print meaningful log under above situation. > > > > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-May/209124.html > > > > Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng > > Thanks for the patch. > Acked-by: Ruifeng Wang Applied, thanks.