From: Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ring: fix eth_dev device pointer on allocation
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 20:09:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61746fd5771ae6d359a02638ee6b5d027b43a981.1588788335.git.grive@u256.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506173259.yqulw5omozcw6szz@u256.net>
When a net_ring device is allocated, its device pointer is not set
before calling rte_eth_dev_probing_finish, which is incorrect.
The following:
commit: 96cb19521147 ("net/ring: use EAL APIs in PMD specific API")
commit: a6992e961050 ("net/ring: set ethernet device field")
already fixed the same issue in 17.08, which was fine at the time.
Adding the hook rte_eth_dev_probing_finish() however created this bug,
as the eth_dev exposed when this hook is executed is expected to be
complete.
Remove the prior attempts to fix the issue in rte_pmd_ring_probe() and
write the pointer properly in do_eth_dev_ring_create().
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Fixes: fbe90cdd776c ("ethdev: add probing finish function")
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
---
drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c b/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c
index 41acbc513..f0fafa0c0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ops = {
static int
do_eth_dev_ring_create(const char *name,
+ struct rte_vdev_device *vdev,
struct rte_ring * const rx_queues[],
const unsigned int nb_rx_queues,
struct rte_ring *const tx_queues[],
@@ -291,12 +292,15 @@ do_eth_dev_ring_create(const char *name,
}
/* now put it all together
+ * - store EAL device in eth_dev,
* - store queue data in internals,
* - store numa_node info in eth_dev_data
* - point eth_dev_data to internals
* - and point eth_dev structure to new eth_dev_data structure
*/
+ eth_dev->device = &vdev->device;
+
data = eth_dev->data;
data->rx_queues = rx_queues_local;
data->tx_queues = tx_queues_local;
@@ -408,7 +412,9 @@ rte_eth_from_ring(struct rte_ring *r)
}
static int
-eth_dev_ring_create(const char *name, const unsigned int numa_node,
+eth_dev_ring_create(const char *name,
+ struct rte_vdev_device *vdev,
+ const unsigned int numa_node,
enum dev_action action, struct rte_eth_dev **eth_dev)
{
/* rx and tx are so-called from point of view of first port.
@@ -438,7 +444,7 @@ eth_dev_ring_create(const char *name, const unsigned int numa_node,
return -1;
}
- if (do_eth_dev_ring_create(name, rxtx, num_rings, rxtx, num_rings,
+ if (do_eth_dev_ring_create(name, vdev, rxtx, num_rings, rxtx, num_rings,
numa_node, action, eth_dev) < 0)
return -1;
@@ -560,12 +566,12 @@ rte_pmd_ring_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
PMD_LOG(INFO, "Initializing pmd_ring for %s", name);
if (params == NULL || params[0] == '\0') {
- ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, rte_socket_id(), DEV_CREATE,
+ ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, dev, rte_socket_id(), DEV_CREATE,
ð_dev);
if (ret == -1) {
PMD_LOG(INFO,
"Attach to pmd_ring for %s", name);
- ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, rte_socket_id(),
+ ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, dev, rte_socket_id(),
DEV_ATTACH, ð_dev);
}
} else {
@@ -574,19 +580,16 @@ rte_pmd_ring_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
if (!kvlist) {
PMD_LOG(INFO,
"Ignoring unsupported parameters when creatingrings-backed ethernet device");
- ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, rte_socket_id(),
+ ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, dev, rte_socket_id(),
DEV_CREATE, ð_dev);
if (ret == -1) {
PMD_LOG(INFO,
"Attach to pmd_ring for %s",
name);
- ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, rte_socket_id(),
+ ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, dev, rte_socket_id(),
DEV_ATTACH, ð_dev);
}
- if (eth_dev)
- eth_dev->device = &dev->device;
-
return ret;
}
@@ -597,7 +600,7 @@ rte_pmd_ring_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
if (ret < 0)
goto out_free;
- ret = do_eth_dev_ring_create(name,
+ ret = do_eth_dev_ring_create(name, dev,
internal_args->rx_queues,
internal_args->nb_rx_queues,
internal_args->tx_queues,
@@ -627,6 +630,7 @@ rte_pmd_ring_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
for (info->count = 0; info->count < info->total; info->count++) {
ret = eth_dev_ring_create(info->list[info->count].name,
+ dev,
info->list[info->count].node,
info->list[info->count].action,
ð_dev);
@@ -635,7 +639,7 @@ rte_pmd_ring_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
PMD_LOG(INFO,
"Attach to pmd_ring for %s",
name);
- ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name,
+ ret = eth_dev_ring_create(name, dev,
info->list[info->count].node,
DEV_ATTACH,
ð_dev);
@@ -644,9 +648,6 @@ rte_pmd_ring_probe(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
}
}
- if (eth_dev)
- eth_dev->device = &dev->device;
-
out_free:
rte_kvargs_free(kvlist);
rte_free(info);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 10:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/failsafe: fix fd leak wangyunjian
2020-04-27 11:12 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-04-27 16:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-03 11:33 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-05-04 16:22 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-05-04 16:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-05-05 9:47 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-05-05 9:14 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-05-05 18:35 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-05-05 19:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] failsafe & ring fixes Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-05 19:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] net/failsafe: avoid crash on malformed eth_dev Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-06 17:16 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 19:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] net/ring: fix eth_dev device pointer on allocation Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-06 11:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-06 12:33 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-05-06 13:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-06 17:32 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-05-06 18:09 ` Gaetan Rivet [this message]
2020-05-08 11:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-11 16:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-05 19:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] net/failsafe: fix default service proxy state Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-06 8:58 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-05-06 17:16 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61746fd5771ae6d359a02638ee6b5d027b43a981.1588788335.git.grive@u256.net \
--to=grive@u256.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).