DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] driver/net/mpipe: support native build on tilegx platform.
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:00:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6194137.BU55KgHhRV@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160210094955.GA4084@bricha3-MOBL3>

2016-02-10 09:49, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:47:55PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-02-09 21:15, Liming Sun:
> > > Looks like this patch serie has been merged into dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04.
> > > What would be the usual way to submit changes for new comments? Would it be incremental changes (new commit) based on previous one? Thanks.
> > 
> > Good question.
> > I think it's better if Bruce drops or reverts the commits from dpdk-next-net
> > to let you re-submit a better new version.
> > Bruce, do you agree?
> 
> Unless there is something actually broken - that was previously working - by 
> this patchset I'd rather not revert it. This patch was sitting acked for a month
> which is a reasonable time for comments before applying it. Allowing people to
> step up post-apply and look for patches being reverted is not something we want
> to encourage IMHO. There are already too many reviews being done at the last
> minute, and allowing reverts may make that situation worse, while applying acked
> patches within a reasonable time - irrespective of whether people subsequently
> find issues with them - should encourage earlier reviews, and makes it easier on
> contributors.

Yes you are right.

> Therefore I'd rather see any additional enhancements or changes
> done as incremental patches on top of this set.
> 
> Regards,
> /Bruce
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-10 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15 15:37 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Some misc fixes and optimization for the mpipe driver Liming Sun
2015-12-15 15:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] driver/net/mpipe: support native build on tilegx platform Liming Sun
2016-01-08  2:59   ` Tony Lu
2015-12-15 15:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] driver/net/mpipe: optimize mpipe buffer return mechanism Liming Sun
2016-01-08  3:04   ` Tony Lu
2015-12-15 15:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] driver/net/mpipe: fix a mpipe link initialization ordering issue Liming Sun
2016-01-08  3:08   ` Tony Lu
2016-01-08 14:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] driver/net/mpipe: support native build on tilegx platform Liming Sun
2016-01-08 14:30     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] driver/net/mpipe: optimize mpipe buffer return mechanism Liming Sun
2016-01-08 14:30     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] driver/net/mpipe: fix a mpipe link initialization ordering issue Liming Sun
2016-02-09 15:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] driver/net/mpipe: support native build on tilegx platform Bruce Richardson
2016-02-09 16:16     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-09 18:37       ` Liming Sun
2016-02-09 20:33         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-09 21:15           ` Liming Sun
2016-02-09 22:47             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-10  9:49               ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-10 10:00                 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-03-08 19:48           ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6194137.BU55KgHhRV@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).