From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5FAA04A3; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEBF1BF73; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:44:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F5D1BF72 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E8A5C00D7; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:44:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:44:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= UAAGVQWUiUlyV4t6N9yO5464sxTyf7HU2SYpm2PnlMU=; b=LCIVsu7cIaE53UtN XvIAnsGiiQGqccw64VRcNh8UBZfex487VQPtqadS6VvqUsMMDwr6kI+YqoK3lQNU bQpyqKB9xCHrrp8Yqj4LKOn7HMuChgW7SMSet6noZWrxdTjv7zNfz3xOnanBoPEL 8Y86bw8SvSuegaRCR9TyLnx3DldtM5tsO34dTUrZNS7lWks1ovhu4wku0puQGPop 2+3IN9ND+9hEWEe4YF1grbtgwWUtcYRHutKCnu4oG2my9JxWyZ2hc2U9GNbwOAux faDmKowN2cTLWEoDOnrWHSd0AbKk3REaY4NoSBaUa89eH0/2jAiH9bqhAXroRZH8 62l5Lg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=UAAGVQWUiUlyV4t6N9yO5464sxTyf7HU2SYpm2Pnl MU=; b=No2kEm1qHij9dgNgxYEqmzM2tvBMjKo8Xk6WpFhQouqzq/1q1/U+yegqA w08Z+FEbCMg8CM2uxUINa5/JnGnOQyDiw1qWzoywvDxbveQoAzy2PefahR8XmbX0 d3lKVEUA+Mx/UtOd2/mwyPW08fUzPP2+rKpeQYOn5vYb667N3jBa9FJ2Ho9ZUq6B 1LmPZQF1GifAGQaKBdCEnx3n+G6NhWQ8gj0CXNQXzghfnvD+aCZT2LLU8xKL1Grt 0NbLLrU+mbuxgvPtUYaaOy8tOmyp6890dKPN1NQoOieM3734/Qy+L/qN0dh+c4uc iXyawQu6BubaxC38nwlN+1cIdSZDA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudejtddgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1320F30618C1; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:44:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Luca Boccassi Cc: Kevin Traynor , dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:44:24 +0200 Message-ID: <6245559.rmFrDPG0Ap@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200229163706.12741-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <4740923.upeRZZJTqa@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Fix various typos found by Lintian X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 26/04/2020 11:49, Luca Boccassi: > On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 19:47 +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 04/03/2020 16:28, Luca Boccassi: > > > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 14:34 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > > > On 29/02/2020 16:37, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Debian's linter is getting more and more annoy^^smart and now > > > > > parses binaries > > > > > for typos too - CC stable to get it off my back in the next > > > > > release > > > > > > > > Minor: Probably linter is better trained in the Queen's English > > > > than > > > > me > > > > or it could be personal preference, but 'one' seems to be > > > > referring > > > > to > > > > the user and it reads a bit strange for me. e.g. > > > > > > > > "Slave %d capabilities doesn't allow one to allocate additional > > > > queues" > > > > "hardware specifications that allow one to handle virtual memory" > > > > "Do not allow one to send packet if the maximum DMA.." > > > > > > > > as opposed to > > > > > > > > "Slave %d capabilities don't allow allocation of additional > > > > queues" > > > > "hardware specifications that allow handling of virtual memory" > > > > "Do not allow sending of a packet if the maximum DMA.." > > > > > > You might be right - but the intent here is not to be correct, it's > > > to > > > get the linter to leave me alone :-) > > > > I agree with Kevin that the wording "allow one to make" is strange. > > Would lintian leave you alone with "allow making"? > > > > Anyway the "allow to" sentences are not typos. > > They could be reworded in a separate patch. > > > > Patch partly applied, except the "allow one to" changes, thanks. > > It probably would work - will check in the next cycle. What are the news from Lintian?