DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Andy Moreton <amoreton@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/sfc: stop misuse of Rx ingress m-port metadata on EF100
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:43:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62ba45af-c587-f8a1-b18c-147db93e25ce@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de52b1ce-c203-acf1-2f1a-ff23427d08c2@oktetlabs.ru>

On 3/10/2023 2:18 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 3/9/23 07:11, Ivan Malov wrote:
>> The driver supports representor functionality. In it,
>> packets coming from VFs to the dedicated back-end Rx
>> queue get demultiplexed into front-end Rx queues of
>> representor ethdevs as per the per-packet metadata
>> indicating logical HW ingress ports. On transmit,
>> packets are provided with symmetrical metadata
>> by front-end Tx queues, and the back-end queue
>> transforms the data into so-called Tx override
>> descriptors. These let the packets bypass flow
>> lookup and go directly to the represented VFs.
>>
>> However, in the Rx part, the driver extracts
>> the said metadata on every HW Rx queue, that
>> is, not just on the one used by representors
>> Doing so leads to a buggy behaviour. It is
>> revealed by operating testpmd as follows:
>>
>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:c6:00.0 -a 0000:c6:00.1 -- -i
>>
>> testpmd> flow create 0 transfer pattern port_representor \
>>   port_id is 0 / end actions port_representor port_id 1 / end
>> Flow rule #0 created
>>
>> testpmd> set fwd io
>> testpmd> start tx_first
>>
>> testpmd> flow destroy 0 rule 0
>> Flow rule #0 destroyed
>>
>> testpmd> stop
>>
>>    ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 0 
>> -----------------
>>    RX-packets: 19196498       RX-dropped: 0             RX-total:
>> 19196498
>>    TX-packets: 19196535       TX-dropped: 0             TX-total:
>> 19196535
>>   
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>    ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 1 
>> -----------------
>>    RX-packets: 19196503       RX-dropped: 0             RX-total:
>> 19196503
>>    TX-packets: 19196530       TX-dropped: 0             TX-total:
>> 19196530
>>   
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> In this scenario, two physical functions of the adapter
>> do not have any corresponding "back-to-back" forwarder
>> on peer host. Packets transmitted from port 0 can only
>> be forwarded to port 1 by means of a special flow rule.
>>
>> The flow rule indeed works, but destroying it does not
>> stop forwarding. Port statistics carry on incrementing.
>>
>> Also, it is apparent that forwarding in the opposite
>> direction must not have worked in this case as the
>> flow is meant to target only one of the directions.
>>
>> Because of the bug, the first 32 mbufs received
>> as a result of the flow rule operation have the
>> said metadata present. In io mode, testpmd does
>> not tamper with mbufs and passes them directly
>> to transmit path, so this data remains in them
>> instructing the PMD to override destinations
>> of the packets via Tx option descriptors.
>>
>> Expected behaviour is as follows:
>>
>>    ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 0 
>> -----------------
>>    RX-packets: 0              RX-dropped: 0             RX-total: 0
>>    TX-packets: 15787496       TX-dropped: 0             TX-total:
>> 15787496
>>   
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>    ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 1 
>> -----------------
>>    RX-packets: 15787464       RX-dropped: 0             RX-total:
>> 15787464
>>    TX-packets: 32             TX-dropped: 0             TX-total: 32
>>   
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> These figures show the rule work only for one direction.
>> Also, removing the flow shall cause forwarding to cease.
>>
>> Provided patch fixes the bug accordingly.
>>
>> Fixes: d0f981a3efd8 ("net/sfc: handle ingress mport in EF100 Rx prefix")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amoreton@xilinx.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h    | 3 +++
>>   drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c | 3 ++-
>>   drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c       | 3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
>> index 246adbd87c..51a44bd034 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>   #ifndef _SFC_DP_RX_H
>>   #define _SFC_DP_RX_H
>>   +#include <stdbool.h>
>> +
>>   #include <rte_mempool.h>
>>   #include <ethdev_driver.h>
>>   @@ -27,6 +29,7 @@ extern "C" {
>>    */
>>   struct sfc_dp_rxq {
>>       struct sfc_dp_queue    dpq;
>> +    bool            need_ingress_mport;
> 
> May be I'm late, but it is a wrong location for the
> information. The information is EF100-specific, but
> the structure is a generic one.
> 
> I'd say that corresponding flag should be set in rxq->flag
> upon creation based on request in qcreate info and
> cleared if Rx prefix does not support it. May be it
> should be an error if we need the information, but Rx prefix
> does not provide it.
> 

Thanks Andrew, patch dropped from next-net, updating patchwork status as
"change requested".

>>   };
>>     /** Datapath receive queue descriptor number limitations */
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
>> b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
>> index 16cd8524d3..c4d256b40d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c
>> @@ -876,7 +876,8 @@ sfc_ef100_rx_qstart(struct sfc_dp_rxq *dp_rxq,
>> unsigned int evq_read_ptr,
>>       else
>>           rxq->flags &= ~SFC_EF100_RXQ_USER_MARK;
>>   -    if ((unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
>> +    if (dp_rxq->need_ingress_mport &&
>> +        (unsup_rx_prefix_fields &
>>            (1U << EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_INGRESS_MPORT)) == 0)
>>           rxq->flags |= SFC_EF100_RXQ_INGRESS_MPORT;
>>       else
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
>> index 5ea98187c3..3d3d7d42e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
>> @@ -1265,6 +1265,9 @@ sfc_rx_qinit(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
>> sfc_sw_index_t sw_index,
>>       if (rc != 0)
>>           goto fail_dp_rx_qcreate;
>>   +    rxq_info->dp->need_ingress_mport =
>> +        ((rxq_info->type_flags & EFX_RXQ_FLAG_INGRESS_MPORT) != 0);
>> +
>>       evq->dp_rxq = rxq_info->dp;
>>         rxq_info->state = SFC_RXQ_INITIALIZED;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  4:11 Ivan Malov
2023-03-10 14:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-10 14:18 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-03-10 14:43   ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-03-10 17:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Ivan Malov
2023-03-12  7:59   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-03-12 10:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Ivan Malov
2023-03-16 17:02   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-09  8:00   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-04-12 12:04   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-12 13:57 ` [PATCH v4] " Ivan Malov
2023-04-17  9:06   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62ba45af-c587-f8a1-b18c-147db93e25ce@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=amoreton@xilinx.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).