From: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/4] fbarray: fix incorrect lookahead behavior
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62d5744a70ba1cde7d1dcf5311fdbc24d317b695.1720454625.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1720454625.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Currently, whenever last bit of current index mask is set (meaning, there is
potentially a run starting at the end of the mask), lookahead loop is entered.
In that loop, if the first bit of lookahead mask is not set, the lookahead is
stopped, and the current lookahead mask index is assigned to current index mask.
However, because at that point we are inside a for-loop that increments current
index mask after each iteration, this results in erroneous mask index
increment.
Fixlookahead to avoid erroneous increment, and add corresponding unit test.
Fixes: c44d09811b40 ("eal: add shared indexed file-backed array")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Vipin P R <vipinp@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_fbarray.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_fbarray.c b/app/test/test_fbarray.c
index 26a51e2a3e..bf89b99e5b 100644
--- a/app/test/test_fbarray.c
+++ b/app/test/test_fbarray.c
@@ -103,6 +103,14 @@ static int empty_msk_test_setup(void)
return 0;
}
+static int lookahead_test_setup(void)
+{
+ /* set index 64 as used */
+ param.start = 64;
+ param.end = 64;
+ return init_array();
+}
+
static int test_invalid(void)
{
struct rte_fbarray dummy;
@@ -709,6 +717,20 @@ static int test_empty(void)
return TEST_SUCCESS;
}
+static int test_lookahead(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* run regular test first */
+ ret = test_find();
+ if (ret != TEST_SUCCESS)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* test if we can find free chunk while not starting with 0 */
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(rte_fbarray_find_next_n_free(¶m.arr, 1, param.start),
+ param.start + 1, "Free chunk index is wrong\n");
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
static struct unit_test_suite fbarray_test_suite = {
.suite_name = "fbarray autotest",
@@ -723,6 +745,7 @@ static struct unit_test_suite fbarray_test_suite = {
TEST_CASE_ST(last_msk_test_setup, reset_array, test_find),
TEST_CASE_ST(full_msk_test_setup, reset_array, test_find),
TEST_CASE_ST(empty_msk_test_setup, reset_array, test_empty),
+ TEST_CASE_ST(lookahead_test_setup, reset_array, test_lookahead),
TEST_CASES_END()
}
};
diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
index 0fe5bcfe06..2680b34823 100644
--- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
+++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_fbarray.c
@@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ find_next_n(const struct rte_fbarray *arr, unsigned int start, unsigned int n,
* as well, so skip that on next iteration.
*/
ignore_msk = ~((1ULL << need) - 1);
- msk_idx = lookahead_idx;
+ /* outer loop will increment msk_idx so add 1 */
+ msk_idx = lookahead_idx - 1;
break;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-08 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 16:07 [PATCH v1 0/4] fbarray lookahead/lookbehind fixes Anatoly Burakov
2024-07-08 16:07 ` Anatoly Burakov [this message]
2024-07-08 16:07 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] fbarray: fix incorrect lookbehind behavior Anatoly Burakov
2024-07-08 16:07 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] fbarray: fix lookahead ignore mask handling Anatoly Burakov
2024-07-08 16:07 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] fbarray: fix lookbehind " Anatoly Burakov
2024-07-09 4:57 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] fbarray lookahead/lookbehind fixes David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62d5744a70ba1cde7d1dcf5311fdbc24d317b695.1720454625.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).