From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0A7A0C41; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:30:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FCB4067C; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:30:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612F940150 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:30:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42810580D6C; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:30:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 7zTMVHGJqdQ/mxAj32qnG15d7B9MWsn3TF2WvcWM4ek=; b=mSt3E55wGIaOsfsD YvE7IhDmgaYnnl0g3QCXil9QML8nS5lJRcgeiNLerBwigDHDSmxQRwTE0MkaYcvW DFboQeIoTYGzPcDC/gaSULoNRgANPtAurG1RNnqUVGBI0msCfOJwGRnM3yjHq1OM SFBL8sdxPOs+iIbj/kMZHz2nJ7Jij2nep2qTS/hBNXO17+HBseQP/M0RhGcGUQBD F0qvyeDu5uRCpSLUGMaNZAkco01wk/AD9/2i/n1vGSwV0kRhc0/dPA1Oqe4PWdYf 2WAq3FlDRsiBMBUCQaYFsQpsuyyHHFkvXrLRGdtCAxa+jCLIUM+1Xi+kw2AWWin+ jilepQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=7zTMVHGJqdQ/mxAj32qnG15d7B9MWsn3TF2WvcWM4 ek=; b=px3eKaK98XkcwO/7s053da5lvXQSd50QglUQqozFHs9Vr0tp6Og1jjEQL 0olx/VrBB6mxUgUVnFV1hFcYGpTZqNsswVXsARHCLnW5zlvyqHloEoXxHbNX8uAb whLESFcolxZo9Gjhr5Dr6cmnZPzZUP0mJR+Ug2gb+NrctowNarBHOFlyKws1DYIr 2NMBuqz+3AgicI+8Iy1j3Hb9V3Z8UIOYAISy5jY8fux2C00okQgwVT4OcHZA3NHv QgKMl57aF0bXlVkMBzaBQOqZGDi0HA/2lS/0WS3T5ywvRqJx6mTYvXKexAdslzk0 /NYJcVe1M2repPLOcwAP8imxIjtuA== X-ME-Sender: <xms:-dooYT5xroZ3I_akHOzNCmXDzHshqX7WAETC300FP9aKgN4I1zFm_g> <xme:-dooYY4HIoOP6bYehKGkIvMgDTt9bhVRPAQ4K0H1rad0hNjwgiVYC_TQom9u5rqoW S8VdZXtnhmuIKnxpA> X-ME-Received: <xmr:-dooYacjj3polpX_ssICFaWc0sbBln6SY6s7jcbHEJaiGmv6VdOd9S0kdjB9OnNlVbDRmVacIfz_wvQ9v4RjwdPagg> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddruddufedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-dooYUKk0b0pQdLhSx-9_H5TXJOc-baKUbPUJkDBgGbTdBlJq_dA3g> <xmx:-dooYXIA8hAgPN4qXkRK3gpzPy3q7_UKuTmWT-POlkEMdxG2CqPnEg> <xmx:-dooYdw4b2l3cVI-2UPtJs2N4wO8biDxzmBtZuIa6WuAIe9HLMyy2w> <xmx:-9ooYYg6-3fLno4Va-DJ8pdljPslWcliuRj2_LieSw3SVmiPJELoeQ> Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:30:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>, Ziyang Xuan <xuanziyang2@huawei.com>, Xiaoyun Wang <cloud.wangxiaoyun@huawei.com>, Guoyang Zhou <zhouguoyang@huawei.com>, Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>, Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>, Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>, Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>, Devendra Singh Rawat <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>, Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>, Maciej Czekaj <mczekaj@marvell.com>, Jian Wang <jianwang@trustnetic.com>, Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>, Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@intel.com>, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:30:44 +0200 Message-ID: <6419779.oJmSqRMgos@thomas> In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1My=w3KP2ChTLJKAdg8QAUidYcmapseEkwzA8C-bawxVg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20210730052434.2627818-1-jerinj@marvell.com> <YRurpLAYuOLkfDre@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <CALBAE1My=w3KP2ChTLJKAdg8QAUidYcmapseEkwzA8C-bawxVg@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] drivers: remove warning with meson 0.59.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> 17/08/2021 14:54, Jerin Jacob: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 5:59 PM Bruce Richardson > <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 01:05:48PM +0530, jerinj@marvell.com wrote: > > > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> > > > > > > Since meson 0.59.0 version, the extract_all_objects() API > > > need to pass explicit boolean value. > > > > > > To remove the following warning[1], added explicit `true` for > > > extract_all_objects() use in codebase whever there is > > > no argument. > > > > > > [1] > > > WARNING: extract_all_objects called without setting recursive > > > keyword argument. Meson currently defaults to > > > non-recursive to maintain backward compatibility but > > > the default will be changed in the future. > > > > > > > Technically this is changing the default behaviour since it previously > > defaulted to "false". However, since there should be no recursion involved > > here anyway, I don't think it matters, correct? > > Yes. To be on the safer side, I just put "true" in case some drivers > using for a recursive way. Bruce, are you OK with the change?