From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BF1A0A03; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:57:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28819140DA0; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:57:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1D6140D8F for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:57:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AA61896; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:57:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:57:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= 2tGpalEQetLQFn5yRDmJH0mWUVbNo/ofFxpNATN6KGs=; b=FZ0SmVPcAGggvbEs y0VY7TzXpD2/5cxsQtcsEs/gzkzxVtiTF+2u5wITWZMifnDJF2of5RW5c54sPUdh RobduW7FVAeHuYsN6sP6/bElWzBFYjPjQ0IRhhKW9/D9iaUsV+HQry0XDqEF79VJ UhexYuXvNoJirCbY32TXrlMiVlLiHgbgsTsphc6LmQ2wW/X3I0D7VS00fgV5PPcj r/HwfM1rcatf6Nwe/KanX9WjBG1yrQGsXKDJ6TXrxPg8yUAN1QwAZLEkqihEMGuR /IyBm80veAAQMbrfzLMaqs2L0j2s3rOlScdkwOUAAPkdwVJS+STcOPUB9OWl6x1Q o4Dh8A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2tGpalEQetLQFn5yRDmJH0mWUVbNo/ofFxpNATN6K Gs=; b=CLVL7dInF+TcKMVFB1GPAPEB2HCQQTJVcfwDRH7qEelKjf70TChfPp+cS 0jKrIxlPbk/HYVLCDC+s+WPSLNIGbgDL0vQ3fJwzVjlnDovHcyxIUoInoAMoEjtb kQWOLY9tN4CQmhcmn8BCzL8ZPz3WE94XjTim0OG7doovdZRIpbAu7lAv/Jaq+yOS dIRy+Wn/UQipDklcxvdAa63gKsTYQCH+a++Q/K51eJKyrlEmFLlr0QesVc6eAcRq GFSn4dPPvwCcQzOVMw+FL/TwvU8DMjFsqeo4RyXad0vglhMhXpH0XYSRpewDl2+F HSzU2H60TUqU0e6SpMgq/mbDvWW+w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrtdekgddutdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4A83D1080059; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Xueming Li , Ajit Khaparde Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , Olivier Matz , dpdk-dev , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Asaf Penso Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:57:09 +0100 Message-ID: <6467622.ieihe5XLyd@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1608303356-13089-2-git-send-email-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <1610968623-31345-2-git-send-email-xuemingl@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/9] ethdev: introduce representor type X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/01/2021 18:42, Ajit Khaparde: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:17 AM Xueming Li wrote: > > +enum rte_eth_representor_type { > > + RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_NONE, /**< not a representor. */ > > + RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_VF, /**< representor of VF. */ > > + RTE_ETH_REPRESENTOR_SF, /**< representor of SF. */ > Till we get used to the terminology... > Can we also have SF = "Sub Function" mentioned in the docs or comments? Are we sure about the definition? I remember seeing SF = Scalable Function somewhere else (maybe from Intel)