From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DA07F60 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:23:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r20so5008508wiv.14 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:33:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=hrKUj0h02PKHNHYwBf5P2FaLVmiYnDqbOiL5h/kSFzk=; b=LMcW+m3Ko/djfgnyOQzDLLYjnnEKm+WE1b2NDOfdduRErNH0ebsGoREa1VU4hK3nDJ mIm7j8Hn5Oz1TSTTyH/DdS61HdaIEeP4Dw5uBgg693ys2egPBsuSYCW56MN6Og6SSFZl 0dptcePdrI5yFNJ4AG0iExbKHcpe3g6LVV4qg5H29cLigqjXgmj6/QGhRc98nr4mgRds 6k72vZ8B3rCnzZ66whE/CGkWpG+cC6iaW7KBrV7Vc62bYSA2o1BhNstaPg7frnm/r5UP uRmmLR5SsLu1rkAJcdykp/8i8oHMBwJSfxD040t7d19W0H3joYgbnvj7zrpfLpdBsn+t 29nQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlULx1HUrA83bEaaK4znA1ZIJZt8R9980L8OEhCyxCB+FRHT5dQGDWEeJSMetRKJt33NDSv X-Received: by 10.180.101.200 with SMTP id fi8mr22478263wib.77.1416483235602; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wa10sm2990541wjc.8.2014.11.20.03.33.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 03:33:54 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tapio Tallgren Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:33:33 +0100 Message-ID: <6470390.sH3U320kkz@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (Linux/3.17.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20141120111727.GA2609@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20141120111727.GA2609@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Newbie question: compiling virtio-net-pmd v1.2 fails with dpdk 1.7 on a VM X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:23:26 -0000 2014-11-20 06:17, Neil Horman: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:14:35AM +0200, Tapio Tallgren wrote: > > Looks like a version conflict? Dpdk 1.7 should support virtio-pmd so what > > am I doing wrong? > > Nothing, its a bug. DPDK changed the API here with commit > 9aaccf1abdb2894ec23870e1d2199a657f85850e but it never got changed in the > virtio_user pmd. You need to modify the pmd like the other call sites have been > in the above commit. > > This is why those external pmds need to be merged into the dpdk tree. Yes, exactly. We'll see during 2.0 cycle how to merge them. The ideal plan is to keep only 1 implementation. In the meantime, patches are welcome. -- Thomas