From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639E2A04E7; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:08:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FBABBB4; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:08:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E2CBB94 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:08:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A835C0174; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 18:08:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:08:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= DTtIziyBhXhCId/HysZY/u/hNRnvRMUhC4jJTIpH1so=; b=I7PBy2QIywkTxuon CBd/LlYJiw/aCkSKNHDKf09dck5x9sx6uycT6Khlt1eV5CHKsdTuG5JpQ+uHB9d5 GoIsRz9o9OjUl0+zrEoieKSfA/jS8Tr9K+VIC99gO7F3zyTDY4qLVIFXgl/j9ozS rsk2eX6n2qu5mT17UM3u1TqMij75JQjWOkbyeUvKJs0kMFBFbMGKorHMUFy5V/Uf w22gXeueseCqkndN9IXObmF70dmfQMQ7FM5msyqw41CCD+CzN1tKkuuUXXl4j9rc dPX4WfgxBpvres4Lws3+qcSBwBdTwCBJiGrEM/XP56rYOymlB0KusokXCu8Y09Z4 dsKRxQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=DTtIziyBhXhCId/HysZY/u/hNRnvRMUhC4jJTIpH1 so=; b=cd780WHMNmF22n2DaP/skfxYN1OZmb0JT5goIdEzAo435njVGgdUvQBEV PA4j1FpSCHuocvzpgOIA053NiMF4V8oPlphoMcEde9ZX4XfpAWDcRs7xIm3sko61 sFnoJVYIrr13nuLqRDWzf8gJ8UO6YJkSwMcNj54e4yxu/7VPv34XlkT2Q422dhLl iailgaUFZka1YkQMS6R+GonfyElfqC/oYlToygd8u58M7gCIpuENKnE1B3YGaYFX hcxvIC3w1X47bvLkgI1G9Ws2J+s6GktOYYkCd7TOuO6YMQ7HykoEzyoRcJlXtM0v 7lG5DXA0sSQQ/cktktmi/ulMw5cVg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtgedgtdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 21D5E3064674; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 18:08:19 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Jiawen Wu , dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:08:16 +0100 Message-ID: <6496862.mUQds5VCSJ@thomas> In-Reply-To: <6e95b6fe-d341-ac17-ff22-57e9b3a8cc2d@intel.com> References: <20201019085415.82207-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <000301d6ac0a$5be17140$13a453c0$@trustnetic.com> <6e95b6fe-d341-ac17-ff22-57e9b3a8cc2d@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/58] net: txgbe PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/10/2020 12:37, Ferruh Yigit: > On 10/27/2020 2:39 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote: > > On Monday, October 26, 2020 10:56 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks. > >> > >> 57/58 & 58/58 has been distributed to the relevant commits while merging, > >> please double check them in the upstream repo. > >> > >> 56/58 & 53/58 has been dropped while merging. > >> 56/58 needs a new version which can be send individually, > >> 53/58 is adding a deprecated feature, it can't go in as it is. > >> > >> Also can you please send a patch for the comment mentioned in 38/58? > > > > I will send two additional patches, one as a new version for 56/58, the other one to fix 'rte_panic()'. When pulling in the main branch, I see some checkpatches warnings (in order of criticality): Using rte_smp_[r/w]mb Using rte_panic/rte_exit Using compiler attribute directly Please could you fix them (at least first two) before the second series?