From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEA2A0C43; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0714068F; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:54:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6935B4003C for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:53:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B235C00DC; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:53:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:53:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= dIk/ozjFxHvb/PUNWlRPtKu5JtQvomNc9zDOxqy/gCg=; b=H4dArZ6+zmqgs5jq z8Oh+mAr2zGAZ7kDyEA3hZMAe/7ztwGZbpjNwpZyx7XfcwGxBNbkuQZ/sQDc14Lu tJbBXdvC4K3oC557RodxRekneKIrW9n6/dCN3a4/IOC9ns+vTfM41pWDY0KPooJS KMXA1A1px4RxNwAzsEUCnBLmAdUTQ+MD/xNTUQ7MLKmBtaMn2nqDw9bYwmDKolmq RPHBU66I4etg2tgB2rNyyySc1cO11jvNhLxz0yXLeymhtduiJnryDZs3Zqo6SyfJ J9JvOliqdIpHCsCiYXgc6ZytuCoP83ypNi5FKEOTs+AxcIlNJL10DmE5FJtSLe/b g4ViCQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=dIk/ozjFxHvb/PUNWlRPtKu5JtQvomNc9zDOxqy/g Cg=; b=dxacr3McL3AATUMZHOIUdLOeVOBCbEf3laV+4hgTzYaYzBVWf+zf/rEs1 DQT+52eqheIwWwuzTOg5dr1OPFbnUi2OhCqnXcJuzmW48zbLSf/d+W/E9IN1mcbe RNDSOWsR+cbgIYqYEvwEelMF1vqc0mXLN+xLX9DeWEN59CS0zYffxzYDT7GfWhoS Ml32ZfBi9s41boo/EC9JYVOUYMcXUJPdOFJJO5Va0sFJc4R0Ep6sROSXKR8nInur EH1ZOgPm1vdlhRhccFUK4zUuqWzgajnP301T2YFJyFuPZcuNDPWSAg7UH9iI9ECk PAYgZ5srcAMAIZ9FosBY9ZfepYBwQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudegkedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:53:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, Asaf Penso , John McNamara , Ajit Khaparde , Bruce Richardson Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:53:54 +0200 Message-ID: <6502593.BjeyWQVfyn@thomas> In-Reply-To: <6b842212-dc7f-d8cc-ba24-0aa88bca74ea@intel.com> References: <1610304247-11455-1-git-send-email-asafp@nvidia.com> <2766038.zeebYbSGT0@thomas> <6b842212-dc7f-d8cc-ba24-0aa88bca74ea@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8] doc: add release milestones definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 03/09/2021 17:35, Ferruh Yigit: > On 9/3/2021 12:50 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 02/09/2021 18:33, Ferruh Yigit: > >> On 8/26/2021 11:11 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> +* Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed. > >>> + > >>> +rc3 > >>> +~~~ > >>> + > >>> +* Priority: applications. No application feature should be accepted after -rc3. > >>> +* New functionality that does not depend on libraries update > >>> + can be integrated as part of -rc3. > >>> +* The application change must include documentation in the relevant .rst files > >>> + (application-specific and release notes if significant). > >>> +* Libraries and drivers cleanup are allowed. > >>> +* Small driver reworks. > >>> +* Critical and minor bug fixes. > >> > >> As mentioned before, my concern is this may create false impression that bugs > >> are fixed only in this phase. What about remove this line completely and update > >> below -rc4 one as 'Critical bug fixes only.'? I think that makes intention more > >> clear. > > > > I had added in -rc2: "Any issue found in -rc1 should be fixed." > > Do you want to remove it as well? > > I think we can keep it, good to highlight one of the major tasks for -rc2 is to > fix defects found in -rc1, and it doesn't limit fixes to ones found in -rc1. Actually I think it is better to remove. It looks weird to have it only in -rc2.