From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B046B62 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:04:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so230542886wic.0 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:04:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=drOkRcY7/IQ1JDC9WYUZ7gxo9fOzwbS1bE+HINphQuY=; b=JkI4e8nXhg/Akm46lbwJos09R8IivN41ZNuPDlLPAYqElMjl4YizwNv3JuxQadUD7X 6ThUcwo1lbrgmkM1XQhbn9Fpf3PmxtyN1m51W8X7FVjGeSTr5LV4HoB4jIQVNfeZttNy izAtWt2ZMWT5iA3dnu7S5qK6CprxhczmdKNpN3jELJx1+jtMDSuekwRLyo+BESFIyhvU nrKyO9rLGHRARtHC28aQrDK6/foIGXHNCZ6lzgRcSZdlMoCN4NAI1AeAemPfixR6YCdc cBZcGhMxBAYUb3uL6+pejr0HcMGlLfysvdRoe/Vu/hpKoVc42oGsjDETF0zECkuOTC2C 4s9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=drOkRcY7/IQ1JDC9WYUZ7gxo9fOzwbS1bE+HINphQuY=; b=HBJ+cbgdetR6UZ/Oe8/LvG0cnMPGUzu1sreK7sqVXzxFRTBYy/REamkXAjcTfeIIFu U+U3BR0NNs80PMWpLwGKxZw8nsSsu/ewxkOonI6o9wnFFsHoKNylMWg62DGjxL29p30D FVisuRdsK3iwwxGsCGe8/iC2xB5EMoArIWQwXe3S8WvQEUJSJbK/INFNTmOvlHG+KBSy OC2lDO5FkF9gvriv4zFeadfcEq+YXEAG9IO0v+vBt7VrTp/HajHfLIdpkzXQBW0AokTl D/swH0C4BeXkIRUsgUANyLVR9GspbCaXjEY8Rp75GqIgzB1O9ueAJ8ytFYXZYLV2wmYp kQTg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzHasP9HEjWsRNpIgF0Bh9r5TMWHMSs518uQgYNCcntVE2MEoCzwl7iL2a8vN1UU42S51z X-Received: by 10.194.143.43 with SMTP id sb11mr3132667wjb.120.1446131051107; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm9608928wmx.23.2015.10.29.08.04.09 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jan Viktorin Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:02:59 +0100 Message-ID: <6525428.t9ZOKbrVDh@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20151029150926.411da3e0@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1445877458-31052-1-git-send-email-viktorin@rehivetech.com> <2039554.9Hm8ZoiZzc@xps13> <20151029150926.411da3e0@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/17] Support ARMv7 architecture X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:04:11 -0000 2015-10-29 15:09, Jan Viktorin: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:02:03 +0100 > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The most basic test is the compilation, then there are some unit tests > > and DTS. > > The unit tests are a problem at the moment. Probably, I will later find > a way, how to perform some unit tests in QEMU. > > > Are you OK to start with a basic daily compilation test? It can be achieved > > with a simple crontab job. > > I can do daily build test in Jenkins or a cron job. > > Is it sufficient to check the master branch? Or you mean to pick patches from > patchwork? That seems quite complicated to me. Yes do what you can. A daily build test of the master branch is the minimum and may be enough to start. As I said below, we may hope having some contributions in test coverage. > > If you or someone else have some time and a machine to do more, it would > > be great. I'm sure the DPDK/ARM will gain enough interest to attract some > > volunteers for more automatic tests.