From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795B9A0524; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8CC41283; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:22:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com (mail-wm1-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CDE4123B for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:22:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id i21-20020a05600c3555b029012eae2af5d4so8490352wmq.4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:22:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=q16Vi2Sfqk05fHBRF5Vw2NCJiDKpK1x/vQ3W/f7tJ38=; b=Z1leOUWAsvZE921ABTsBHpnz/og2n9o+mKp+3UWhv4p1wMSvV62JZRaqaKM6b74yXg 6XHe2iuNnobT2tX4pplYkNec0iRyeUnRiJW/qsqx4kUEJcqEZYq7+u1/x14J1GXY6sbi My62xHLyJLSWRE7//S9U1ZbmkfDjHru+lHQWBqbijzbl7h2a7BYqi9SXCF5r0yUWG/tp q6QtxiBh1oQ4eygU4loYa+WF9jLw5nrZ0GSzu3rPYpBd+49EvxDCUOAbYiMEajGDs8Ut HFl4VKWc+BUeVuD+afisWZi9KbSjy1uybMqGtr72pvSfm41PuYxhNDHjg7oiEPFmc90I WJSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53195UEuBhLTppj6AGBUpGuW/za+hpYCCbcgyVm2pOxbOkR7BRUf sSXBXVSdIqorJ8B/J+u8aQo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWiGlBlSLH1rukGbHjr1MO0Sqeaou314wncZPM5zRs+LEtRGxR90NirDyFC8k4wKO8686w7g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4854:: with SMTP id j20mr21696988wmo.139.1618834923018; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:f419:6f00:7a8e:ed70:5c52:ea3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i20sm18174236wmq.29.2021.04.19.05.22.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6531d1d36a0f1e78bf6c9ee701065bd44e96003a.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Christian Ehrhardt , David Wilder Cc: Aaron Conole , maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, Thomas Monjalon , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , dev , ruifeng.wang@arm.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, David Christensen , jerinjacobk@gmail.com, wilder@us.ibm.com Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:22:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20200402171241.13258-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] add travis ci support for ppc64le X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 16:45 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 7:13 PM David Wilder wrote: > > This patch series adds Travis gcc compilation jobs and unit testing > > for ppc64le. Limitations for ppc64le are similar to arm64 (see commit > > 31bb45bcfd). > >=20 > > 1. Only gcc builds are supported on ppc64le. > > 2. Hugepages are not available in the ppc64le Travis environment. > > 3. Memory requirements are larger for ppc64le due to a higher > > RTE_MAX_LCORE value. > >=20 > > V2: Insures iova-mode is VA when --no-huge is selected. > > Removed setting of --iova-mode=3DVA in test-null.sh. > > V3: Refactor ppc64le changes on top of David Marchand's > > Patch series: "Reorganise Travis jobs" > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158231.html > > V4: Adding unit testing. > > Updated eal/linux: patch to force PA mode when --huge-page is used. > > This should be a more straightforward solution than my V3 patch. > >=20 > > A Travis build with theses patches can be found here: > > https://travis-ci.org/github/djlwilder/dpdk/builds/670214578 > > David Wilder (4): > > eal/linux: force iova-mode va with no-huge option > > devtools: allow test-null.sh to run on ppc64le >=20 > This affects our testing and from reviewing the code I think the first > two are safe and good. > In addition it affects mostly no-huge which is almost testing-only. > Therefore for patch #1 and #2: >=20 > Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrhardt >=20 > @Luca - could you give this a try if it applies and fixes our issues plea= se? > That would also answer DMs question about applicability. Hi, The first patch applies with very minor and trivial refresh for fuzz to 20.11, and fixes the issue for me - the fast suite can now run without privileges in autopkgtest. I'd like to have this included for 21.05 so that we can fix the tests. So: Tested-by: Luca Boccassi --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi