From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:29:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6544717.r8ii0elbbK@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a0a01d05cbf$7f563750$7e02a5f0$@gmail.com>
Hi,
2015-03-12 14:24, Raz Amir:
> Thank you.
> Can you tell when will the patch be pushed to the source code?
This is changing the behaviour. I think we should keep it for 2.1 and check if
some docs must be updated in the meantime.
Then we should look at general behaviour for binding/unbinding devices in DPDK.
I feel it would be better to have a common behaviour with BSD, Linux UIO,
Linux VFIO, etc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2015 12:26
> To: Raz Amir
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] pci: save list of detached devices, and
> re-probe during driver unload
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Raz Amir wrote:
> > Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> > driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list, and
> > re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach on each device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 34
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > index 5ae8560..7a4ed5d 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >
> > #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
> >
> > +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES 128
> > +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {}; static
> > +int num_detached = 0;
> >
> > struct nic_uio_softc {
> > device_t dev_t;
> > @@ -288,17 +291,38 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
> > function = strtol(token, NULL, 10);
> >
> > dev = pci_find_bsf(bus, device, function);
> > - if (dev != NULL)
> > - for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> > - if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend
> &&
> > - pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev)
> > - device_detach(dev);
> > + if (dev == NULL)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
> > + if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> > + pci_get_device(dev) ==
> devices[i].dev) {
> > + if (num_detached <
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> > +
> detached_devices[num_detached++] = dev;
> > + }
> > + else
> > +
> printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be
> reattached\n",
> > +
> MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> > + device_detach(dev);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > nic_uio_unload(void)
> > {
> > + int i;
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_detached; i++) {
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach
> for dev=%p...\n",
> > + detached_devices[i]);
> > + device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > + printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > --
> > 2.1.2
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 6:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Raz Amir
2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-01 14:21 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-01 17:16 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-02 8:18 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 11:36 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-02 11:58 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-03 11:30 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 11:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-03 12:56 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 9:07 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 10:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 10:28 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
2015-03-09 8:07 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-09 10:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-10 8:15 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 14:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-11 10:26 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-12 12:24 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-16 16:29 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-07-08 22:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6544717.r8ii0elbbK@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=razamir22@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).