DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@amd.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	ferruh.yigit@amd.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] introduce LLC aware functions
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 06:38:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65f3dc80-2d07-4b8b-9a5c-197eb2b21180@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <288d9e9e-aaec-4dac-b969-54e01956ef4e@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2391 bytes --]

<Snipped>

Thank you Antaloy for the response. Let me try to share my understanding.

> I recently looked into how Intel's Sub-NUMA Clustering would work within
> DPDK, and found that I actually didn't have to do anything, because the
> SNC "clusters" present themselves as NUMA nodes, which DPDK already
> supports natively.

yes, this is correct. In Intel Xeon Platinum BIOS one can enable 
`Cluster per NUMA` as `1,2 or4`.

This divides the tiles into Sub-Numa parition, each having separate 
lcores,memory controllers, PCIe

and accelerator.

>
> Does AMD's implementation of chiplets not report themselves as separate
> NUMA nodes? 

In AMD EPYC Soc, this is different. There are 2 BIOS settings, namely

1. NPS: `Numa Per Socket` which allows the IO tile (memory, PCIe and 
Accelerator) to be partitioned as Numa 0, 1, 2 or 4.

2. L3 as NUMA: `L3 cache of CPU tiles as individual NUMA`. This allows 
all CPU tiles to be independent NUMA cores.


The above settings are possible because CPU is independent from IO tile. 
Thus allowing 4 combinations be available for use.

These are covered in the tuning gudie for the SoC in 12. How to get best 
performance on AMD platform — Data Plane Development Kit 24.07.0 
documentation (dpdk.org) 
<https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/amd_platform.html>.


> Because if it does, I don't really think any changes are
> required because NUMA nodes would give you the same thing, would it not?

I have a different opinion to this outlook. An end user can

1. Identify the lcores and it's NUMA user `usertools/cpu-layout.py`

2. But it is core mask in eal arguments which makes the threads 
available to be used in a process.

3. there are no API which distinguish L3 numa domain. Function 
`rte_socket_id 
<https://doc.dpdk.org/api/rte__lcore_8h.html#a7c8da4664df26a64cf05dc508a4f26df>` 
for CPU tiles like AMD SoC will return physical socket.


Example: In AMD EPYC Genoa, there are total of 13 tiles. 12 CPU tiles 
and 1 IO tile. Setting

1. NPS to 4 will divide the memory, PCIe and accelerator into 4 domain. 
While the all CPU will appear as single NUMA but each 12 tile having 
independent L3 caches.

2. Setting `L3 as NUMA` allows each tile to appear as separate L3 clusters.


Hence, adding an API which allows to select available lcores based on 
Split L3 is essential irrespective of the BIOS setting.


>
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7994 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-02  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-27 15:10 Vipin Varghese
2024-08-27 15:10 ` [RFC 1/2] eal: add llc " Vipin Varghese
2024-08-27 17:36   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-02  0:27     ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-08-27 20:56   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-08-29  3:21     ` 答复: " Feifei Wang
2024-09-02  1:20     ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-03 17:54       ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-09-04  8:18         ` Bruce Richardson
2024-09-06 11:59         ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-12 16:58           ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-08-27 15:10 ` [RFC 2/2] eal/lcore: add llc aware for each macro Vipin Varghese
2024-08-27 21:23 ` [RFC 0/2] introduce LLC aware functions Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-02  0:39   ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-04  9:30     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-04 14:37       ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-11  3:13         ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-11  3:53           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-12  1:11             ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-09 14:22       ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-09 14:52         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-11  3:26           ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-11 15:55             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-11 17:04               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-09-12  1:33                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-12  6:38                   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  7:02                     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 11:23                       ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-12 12:12                         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 15:50                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-12 11:17                     ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-12 11:59                       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12 13:30                         ` Bruce Richardson
2024-09-12 16:32                           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-09-12  2:28                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-11 16:01             ` Bruce Richardson
2024-09-11 22:25               ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-09-12  2:38                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-12  2:19               ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-12  9:17                 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-09-12 11:50                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-13 14:15                     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-12 13:18                   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-08-28  8:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-02  1:08   ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2024-09-02 14:17     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-02 15:33       ` Varghese, Vipin
2024-09-03  8:50         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-05 13:05           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-09-05 14:45             ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-05 15:34               ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-09-06  8:44                 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2024-09-09 14:14                   ` Varghese, Vipin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65f3dc80-2d07-4b8b-9a5c-197eb2b21180@amd.com \
    --to=vipin.varghese@amd.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).