DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [v3 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:10:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66021a79793049649c75f7a83f600433@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120040516.2836371-4-g.singh@nxp.com>



> The current port ID validation logic in the routes add code has
> two issues:
> 
>  - It can pass if port ID in route is 31+.
>  - It silently skips rules with disabled or invalid
>    port IDs
> 
> This patch is:
>  - Improving the enabled port IDs check logic.
>  - Introducing a user option, "exit_on_failure", to control
>    the behavior when attempting to add rules for disabled or
>    invalid port IDs (either exit or skip)
>  - Creating a port ID validation function for use across
>    various setup functions
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
> ---
>  examples/l3fwd/em_route_parse.c |  4 +--
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h          | 16 +++++++++
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c       | 22 +++++++++----
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_fib.c      | 26 ++++++++++-----
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c      | 26 ++++++++++-----
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_route.h    |  2 ++
>  examples/l3fwd/main.c           | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  7 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/em_route_parse.c b/examples/l3fwd/em_route_parse.c
> index 8b534de5f1..b80442d7b8 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/em_route_parse.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/em_route_parse.c
> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
>  #include "l3fwd.h"
>  #include "l3fwd_route.h"
> 
> -static struct em_rule *em_route_base_v4;
> -static struct em_rule *em_route_base_v6;
> +struct em_rule *em_route_base_v4;
> +struct em_rule *em_route_base_v6;
> 
>  enum {
>  	CB_FLD_DST_ADDR,
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h
> index 0cce3406ee..bcbaf4d143 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,15 @@
>  #define L3FWD_HASH_ENTRIES		(1024*1024*1)
>  #endif
> 
> +/* Select Longest-Prefix, Exact match, Forwarding Information Base or Access Control. */
> +enum L3FWD_LOOKUP_MODE {
> +	L3FWD_LOOKUP_DEFAULT,
> +	L3FWD_LOOKUP_LPM,
> +	L3FWD_LOOKUP_EM,
> +	L3FWD_LOOKUP_FIB,
> +	L3FWD_LOOKUP_ACL
> +};
> +
>  struct parm_cfg {
>  	const char *rule_ipv4_name;
>  	const char *rule_ipv6_name;
> @@ -102,6 +111,9 @@ extern struct rte_ether_addr ports_eth_addr[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
>  /* mask of enabled ports */
>  extern uint32_t enabled_port_mask;
> 
> +/* Skip or exit on invalid route */
> +extern bool exit_on_failure;
> +
>  /* Used only in exact match mode. */
>  extern int ipv6; /**< ipv6 is false by default. */
>  extern uint32_t hash_entry_number;
> @@ -222,6 +234,10 @@ init_mem(uint16_t portid, unsigned int nb_mbuf);
>  int config_port_max_pkt_len(struct rte_eth_conf *conf,
>  			    struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info);
> 
> +int
> +l3fwd_validate_routes_port(enum L3FWD_LOOKUP_MODE mode, uint32_t i,
> +			   bool is_ipv4);
> +
>  /* Function pointers for ACL, LPM, EM or FIB functionality. */
>  void
>  setup_acl(const int socketid);
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> index da9c45e3a4..9b482c3c4e 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> @@ -384,9 +384,14 @@ populate_ipv4_flow_into_table(const struct rte_hash *h)
>  		struct in_addr src;
>  		struct in_addr dst;
> 
> -		if ((1 << em_route_base_v4[i].if_out &
> -				enabled_port_mask) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +		ret = l3fwd_validate_routes_port(L3FWD_LOOKUP_EM, i, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (exit_on_failure)
> +				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "IDX: %d: Port ID %d in IPv4 rule is not"
> +					 " enabled\n", i, em_route_base_v4[i].if_out);
> +			else
> +				continue;
> +		}
> 
>  		entry = &em_route_base_v4[i];
>  		convert_ipv4_5tuple(&(entry->v4_key), &newkey);
> @@ -436,9 +441,14 @@ populate_ipv6_flow_into_table(const struct rte_hash *h)
>  		struct em_rule *entry;
>  		union ipv6_5tuple_host newkey;
> 
> -		if ((1 << em_route_base_v6[i].if_out &
> -				enabled_port_mask) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +		ret = l3fwd_validate_routes_port(L3FWD_LOOKUP_EM, i, false);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (exit_on_failure)
> +				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "IDX %d: Port ID %d given in IPv6 rule is not"
> +					 " enabled\n", i, em_route_base_v6[i].if_out);
> +			else
> +				continue;
> +		}
> 
>  		entry = &em_route_base_v6[i];
>  		convert_ipv6_5tuple(&(entry->v6_key), &newkey);
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_fib.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_fib.c
> index 82f1739df7..fa399d8c25 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_fib.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_fib.c
> @@ -667,10 +667,15 @@ setup_fib(const int socketid)
>  	for (i = 0; i < route_num_v4; i++) {
>  		struct in_addr in;
> 
> -		/* Skip unused ports. */
> -		if ((1 << route_base_v4[i].if_out &
> -				enabled_port_mask) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +		/* Check for valid ports */
> +		ret = l3fwd_validate_routes_port(L3FWD_LOOKUP_FIB, i, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (exit_on_failure)
> +				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "IDX %d: Port ID %d in IPv4 rule is not"
> +					 " enabled\n", i, route_base_v4[i].if_out);
> +			else
> +				continue;
> +		}
> 
>  		ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(route_base_v4[i].if_out, &dev_info);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> @@ -725,10 +730,15 @@ setup_fib(const int socketid)
>  	/* Populate the fib IPv6 table. */
>  	for (i = 0; i < route_num_v6; i++) {
> 
> -		/* Skip unused ports. */
> -		if ((1 << route_base_v6[i].if_out &
> -				enabled_port_mask) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +		/* Check for valid ports. */
> +		ret = l3fwd_validate_routes_port(L3FWD_LOOKUP_FIB, i, false);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (exit_on_failure)
> +				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "IDX %d: Port ID %d given in IPv6 rule is not"
> +					" enabled\n", i, route_base_v6[i].if_out);
> +			else
> +				continue;
> +		}
> 
>  		ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(route_base_v6[i].if_out, &dev_info);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> index fec0aeb79c..e3bf2007db 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> @@ -583,10 +583,15 @@ setup_lpm(const int socketid)
>  	for (i = 0; i < route_num_v4; i++) {
>  		struct in_addr in;
> 
> -		/* skip unused ports */
> -		if ((1 << route_base_v4[i].if_out &
> -				enabled_port_mask) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +		/* Check for valid ports */
> +		ret = l3fwd_validate_routes_port(L3FWD_LOOKUP_LPM, i, true);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (exit_on_failure)
> +				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "IDX: %d: Port ID %d in IPv4 rule is not"
> +				 " enabled\n", i, route_base_v4[i].if_out);
> +			else
> +				continue;
> +		}
> 
>  		ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(route_base_v4[i].if_out, &dev_info);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> @@ -630,10 +635,15 @@ setup_lpm(const int socketid)
>  	/* populate the LPM table */
>  	for (i = 0; i < route_num_v6; i++) {
> 
> -		/* skip unused ports */
> -		if ((1 << route_base_v6[i].if_out &
> -				enabled_port_mask) == 0)
> -			continue;
> +		/* Check for valid ports */
> +		ret = l3fwd_validate_routes_port(L3FWD_LOOKUP_LPM, i, false);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (exit_on_failure)
> +				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "IDX %d Port ID %d given in IPv6 rule is not"
> +					" enabled\n", i, route_base_v6[i].if_out);
> +			else
> +				continue;
> +		}
> 
>  		ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(route_base_v6[i].if_out, &dev_info);
>  		if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_route.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_route.h
> index 62263c3540..98254deeeb 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_route.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_route.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ struct em_rule {
> 
>  extern struct lpm_route_rule *route_base_v4;
>  extern struct lpm_route_rule *route_base_v6;
> +extern struct em_rule *em_route_base_v4;
> +extern struct em_rule *em_route_base_v6;
>  extern int route_num_v4;
>  extern int route_num_v6;
> 
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/main.c b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> index 994b7dd8e5..b3b5be4076 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> @@ -63,14 +63,6 @@ uint32_t mb_mempool_cache_size = MEMPOOL_CACHE_SIZE;
>  /**< Ports set in promiscuous mode off by default. */
>  static int promiscuous_on;
> 
> -/* Select Longest-Prefix, Exact match, Forwarding Information Base or Access Control. */
> -enum L3FWD_LOOKUP_MODE {
> -	L3FWD_LOOKUP_DEFAULT,
> -	L3FWD_LOOKUP_LPM,
> -	L3FWD_LOOKUP_EM,
> -	L3FWD_LOOKUP_FIB,
> -	L3FWD_LOOKUP_ACL
> -};
>  static enum L3FWD_LOOKUP_MODE lookup_mode;
> 
>  /* Global variables. */
> @@ -92,7 +84,8 @@ xmm_t val_eth[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> 
>  /* mask of enabled ports */
>  uint32_t enabled_port_mask;
> -
> +bool exit_on_failure; /**< Skip the route rule with invalid or */
> +			      /**< disabled port ID */
>  /* Used only in exact match mode. */
>  int ipv6; /**< ipv6 is false by default. */
> 
> @@ -271,6 +264,43 @@ l3fwd_set_alg(const char *optarg)
>  	parm_config.alg = parse_acl_alg(optarg);
>  }
> 
> +/* This function will work only after read_config_files step */
> +int
> +l3fwd_validate_routes_port(enum L3FWD_LOOKUP_MODE mode, uint32_t i,
> +			   bool is_ipv4)
> +{
> +	uint32_t max_port_count = (sizeof(enabled_port_mask) * CHAR_BIT);
> +
> +	if (mode == L3FWD_LOOKUP_LPM ||
> +			mode == L3FWD_LOOKUP_FIB) {
> +		if (is_ipv4) {
> +			if (route_base_v4[i].if_out >= max_port_count ||
> +				((1 << route_base_v4[i].if_out &
> +				  enabled_port_mask) == 0))
> +				return -1;
> +		} else {
> +			if (route_base_v6[i].if_out >= max_port_count ||
> +				((1 << route_base_v6[i].if_out &
> +				  enabled_port_mask) == 0))
> +				return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else if (mode == L3FWD_LOOKUP_EM) {
> +		if (is_ipv4) {
> +			if (em_route_base_v4[i].if_out >= max_port_count ||
> +				((1 << em_route_base_v4[i].if_out &
> +				  enabled_port_mask) == 0))
> +				return -1;
> +		} else {
> +			if (em_route_base_v6[i].if_out >= max_port_count ||
> +				((1 << em_route_base_v6[i].if_out &
> +				  enabled_port_mask) == 0))
> +				return -1;
> +		}
> +	}

Stupid q - why we don't have any checks for ACL mode? 

> +	return 0;
> +}

      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-15 10:14 [PATCH 1/3] examples/l3fwd: support single route file Gagandeep Singh
2024-07-15 10:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] examples/l3fwd: fix return value on rules add Gagandeep Singh
2024-07-16  6:55   ` Hemant Agrawal
2024-07-15 10:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] examples/l3fwd: fix maximum acceptable port ID in routes Gagandeep Singh
2024-07-17 10:17   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-18  6:30     ` Gagandeep Singh
2024-07-18 10:01       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-22  3:28         ` Gagandeep Singh
2024-07-22  4:27           ` Gagandeep Singh
2024-07-23 16:22             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-24  8:02               ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-08-02 10:13                 ` Gagandeep Singh
2024-08-06  3:41 ` [v2 0/3] L3fwd changes Gagandeep Singh
2024-08-06  3:41   ` [v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: support single route file Gagandeep Singh
2024-08-06  3:41   ` [v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: fix return value on rules add Gagandeep Singh
2024-08-06  3:41   ` [v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking Gagandeep Singh
2024-11-13 19:39     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-19 17:13       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-11-20  4:07         ` Gagandeep Singh
2024-11-20  4:05   ` [v3 0/3] L3fwd changes Gagandeep Singh
2024-11-20  4:05     ` [v3 1/3] examples/l3fwd: support single route file Gagandeep Singh
2024-11-20  4:05     ` [v3 2/3] examples/l3fwd: fix return value on rules add Gagandeep Singh
2024-11-20  4:05     ` [v3 3/3] examples/l3fwd: enhance valid ports checking Gagandeep Singh
2024-11-20 11:10       ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66021a79793049649c75f7a83f600433@huawei.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).