From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.212.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E525A3E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  9 Jul 2015 02:52:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so3919395wiw.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=d8/U2Hk0cvCROMNQUCs9x1lgHt9JYInoK5IeFKedqbw=;
 b=StlHlD3gpvJ6wyPkSw1ZWNQgku3dOwJAj47cmqucyAe+Y+1ByGMi9LzoRGbQz3tjbW
 vAfvZCIkH2wjIePAWkrgvE5l74kY4iGyXzXqLdux+4ZfaEr4c39W2wCt3MFhkq24v74i
 ICvdZTJk7m1/NWlA1AJ/UE3l/0uEUurd3Wgio1Tlg3cfbK+idIQ4dNzjFkuqwaG2LC5o
 uR21F+A6rNV6o/iLDMyyzyxgsEc8XMlEQBzXABTkZDeAqx128sH9fm8xc5gkcPdnH7+t
 caqCEnNN2ATqMN1AGp2S5Wwvzxn6dWHd+GcoRowuauQu63A9qo+aXuJyzy/8LBjg3iso
 mB9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpgXk+HmWftv+Luw8+PnU5EfxYltp5jODxZ/DRKqnSRm99jY3EUwFPhdaimVz3W0I6mXbd
X-Received: by 10.180.91.107 with SMTP id cd11mr73909252wib.51.1436403152948; 
 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm5427829wib.22.2015.07.08.17.52.31
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Zhigang Lu <zlu@ezchip.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 02:51:27 +0200
Message-ID: <6620352.tGbjSFjKPr@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1436172698-21749-7-git-send-email-zlu@ezchip.com>
References: <1436172698-21749-1-git-send-email-zlu@ezchip.com>
 <1436172698-21749-7-git-send-email-zlu@ezchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/12] memzone: refactor
	rte_memzone_reserve() variants
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:52:33 -0000

2015-07-06 16:51, Zhigang Lu:
> The definitions of rte_memzone_reserve_aligned() and
> rte_memzone_reserve_bounded() were identical with the exception of the
> bound argument passed into rte_memzone_reserve_thread_safe().
> 
> This patch removes this replication of code by unifying it into
> rte_memzone_reserve_thread_safe(), which is then called by all three
> variants of rte_memzone_reserve().

Ideally, some functions should be merged to avoid some #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_XEN_DOM0.