From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7D89DE
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  6 Dec 2013 23:00:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a1so1360323wgh.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:01:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=V1D1fk7/UgjMb78KRolwEEtgzcCRHd80QVKK5Pdfzos=;
 b=jCadu/gN5uwV0sh2IBc2OsgSDtRSStoW/IEUX0o7gWnXqMsOhinhGtcJus063sXoZE
 eJPqfw63TpxXxToQ9tMvjoz+vrp5PVNSrvAPDpb/UfNZdIPRa6MLM6XeAiHfqAH6P2XI
 ZBtWfSUl8Ut7Y7WwOl05qG25A1d4Bpqc7Zz5kZ25WxgfzgDNoCy+pc2MGzViXRDv7EO4
 q7f+26hp6G+3eQfr4y8cd/+9PVhm54juzqih2ffSjAtWZDvubIgM7SUyEX+PgHt5akNk
 mcSycJ+w6kLeWUkdq+e7xZnsMf1stzZKvaXyTOV86FSAbok8pK8lsgIekV/Vr2/pYjxi
 Utyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbg4NhF3hya9H1rpFmEEF/XlNq2BMBDSwxvuwRm7jih+Adq6GMrCBaerboiqfsFG7bvwr3
X-Received: by 10.180.106.40 with SMTP id gr8mr4475295wib.48.1386367289567;
 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x220.localnet (abo-107-62-68.mts.modulonet.fr. [85.68.62.107])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 b7sm10041166wiz.8.2013.12.06.14.01.24 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:01:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Pashupati Kumar <kumarp@brocade.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 23:02:24 +0100
Message-ID: <6733914.61HpXdIraN@x220>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.12.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.11.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <6895EAE0CA8DEE40B92D7CA88BB521F332BA572E6B@HQ1-EXCH02.corp.brocade.com>
References: <6895EAE0CA8DEE40B92D7CA88BB521F332BA572E6B@HQ1-EXCH02.corp.brocade.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Bit spinlocks in DPDK
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:00:27 -0000

Hello,

06/12/2013 13:04, Pashupati Kumar :
> We use bit spinlocks extensively to have compact data structures.  Are there
> any plans for adding them to DPDK in some future release?

Not sure to understand your request.
Are you looking for that?
	http://dpdk.org/doc/api/rte__spinlock_8h.html

-- 
Thomas