From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, linuxarm@openeuler.org, mdr@ashroe.eu
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] ethdev: add queue state when retrieve queue information
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:57:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6803418.Bd1l75JkzX@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04c856eb-7112-adf3-f072-ea1a5323c775@intel.com>
16/04/2021 11:41, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 4/16/2021 9:58 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 16/04/2021 10:46, Lijun Ou:
> >> Currently, upper-layer application could get queue state only
> >> through pointers such as dev->data->tx_queue_state[queue_id],
> >> this is not the recommended way to access it. So this patch
> >> add get queue state when call rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get and
> >> rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get API.
> >>
> >> Note: After add queue_state field, the 'struct rte_eth_rxq_info' size
> >> remains 128B, and the 'struct rte_eth_txq_info' size remains 64B, so
> >> it could be ABI compatible.
> > [...]
> >> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> >> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
> >> @@ -251,6 +251,12 @@ ABI Changes
> >> function was already marked as internal in the API documentation for it,
> >> and was not for use by external applications.
> >>
> >> +* Added new field ``queue_state`` to ``rte_eth_rxq_info`` structure
> >> + to provide indicated rxq queue state.
> >> +
> >> +* Added new field ``queue_state`` to ``rte_eth_txq_info`` structure
> >> + to provide indicated txq queue state.
> >
> > Not sure we should add a note here for additions which
> > do not break ABI compatibility.
> > It may be confusing.
> >
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> What do about adding the documentation to "API Changes" section?
> Since 'rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get()'/'rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get()' can get
> 'queue_state' now, which may taken as API change.
That's an addition.
The users have nothing to change in their existing code,
so I think we don't need a note in API or ABI change.
The only required note would be in the "New Features".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 12:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Lijun Ou
2021-03-22 9:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-22 9:38 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-03-22 9:39 ` oulijun
2021-03-22 14:49 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-22 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-22 16:02 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-22 16:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-22 17:07 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-22 18:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-23 10:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-23 10:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-23 11:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-25 10:01 ` oulijun
2021-03-25 10:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-25 11:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-06 0:49 ` oulijun
2021-04-06 1:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-14 10:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-06 14:02 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-14 10:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-14 10:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-15 2:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-15 12:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-15 12:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-15 12:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-15 13:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 0:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] " oulijun
2021-04-16 7:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-16 8:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-16 8:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 9:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-16 9:57 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-23 11:08 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-25 16:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-26 9:48 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-16 9:55 ` oulijun
2021-04-16 9:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-17 3:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V5] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-17 22:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 1:39 ` oulijun
2021-04-19 2:04 ` oulijun
2021-04-19 2:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V6] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19 8:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 8:58 ` oulijun
2021-04-19 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " Lijun Ou
2021-04-19 9:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 10:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-23 11:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V5] " Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-23 11:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-23 15:43 ` Kinsella, Ray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6803418.Bd1l75JkzX@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=oulijun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).